We applied for the visa after consulting the Hungarian representative name Havasi Szoták Csillával in Indian mission . consulates adviser she advised us to bring the following documents which were needed to file visa and she also suggested we need to file C type visa not family reunion visa ..
The documents we presented in front of them were :-
1)Marriage Certificate Both Indian and Hungarian ( appostile ) (with affidavit )
2) Her Bank Statement
3) Salary Certificate
4) Employment Certi
5) Tax Papers
6) Ownership Paper of Her House In Hungary
7) Invitation Letter from Notary
my wife Passport Copy with previous 3 Indian Visaour visa request was denied .. and it suggested some law but we dnt kno yet from where we can get help to apply again as consulate told us apply again how can we apply with improper information.
we downloaded the copy and went with the law but we found nothing which was missed ..still ..O.O?
http://www.kulugyminiszterium.hu/kum/en ... istlation/
Any suggestion what we can do
Thank you very much for your help in advance.
this is the letter we got after rejection _------------
Indian citizen requested by c (EEA - family) type with a visiting purpose of the issuance of a visa of 19 June 1990 Schengen Convention (SVE) 15 Article tation Schengen Borders Code, Article 5 of Regulation No 562/2006 (1)
paragraph a) b) d) e) to this view I reject.
the procedure for administrative service fee shall be borne by the customer
Against this decision to the third-country nationals on entry and stay 2007.Evi II. Law (harmtv.) 9 $ 8 thereof and the free movement and right of residence in
persons for on entry and stay of the Law 1007 annual 1 20 & (6) of the public administration, where there is no appeal
if you want to complain against the decision Looks konszuli submission, the Head of the Mission of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Head of vagay the complaint to the competent body to process 2004. Evi XXIX tv $ 141-143 deal with them in accordance with the exceptions laid down fglaltak
a visa application lodged out during examination
the applicant has not on 2007 of the Law of 4 and 1 of the Treaty.
The above findings of fact, visitors can view (---) C visa can not be
the above reasons, the facts of the administrative proceedings and services to general szavbakyairol Act CXL of 2004 on the Law (hereinafter referred to them) 50 & in complying with
Clarification & kovtoen and 72 (1), according to the operative part, determined in accordance with
The proceedings of the administrative service fee rate of entry and residence procedures for foreigners
Fee grapes 28/2007. (V.31). IRM the basis of the Annex to Regulation
powers and jurisdiction of the VHR. 7 & b) and 8 and (1) sets out kesult 2 Copies
indiai allampolgar altal kerelmezett C (EGT- csaladtagja ) tipusu latogato celu vizum kiadasat az 1990 junius 19-i schengeni vegrehajtasi egyezmeny (sve) 15. cikke, valamint a schengeni hatar -ellenorzesi kodex (Kodex) - 56/2006/EK redelet 5. cikke (1) bekezdesenek a) b) c) d) pontjaiban foglaltakra tekintettel elutasitom az eljaras igazgatasi szolgaltatasi dijat az ugyfel viseli E dontes ellen a harmadik orszagok allampolgarainak beutazasarol es tartozkodasarol szolo, 2007 evi II torveny (harmtv.) 9 $(8) bekezdese , illetve a szabad mozgas es tartozkodas jogaval rendelkezo szemelyek beutazasarol es tartozkodasarol szolo, 2007 evi I torveny 20 $ (6) bekezdese ertelmeben allamigazgatasi uton jogorvoslatnak helye nincs amennyibena dontes ellen panaszt kivan tenni ugy beadvanyaval a konzuli osztalay vezetojehez a kulkeviselet vezetojehez vagy a kulugyminiszteriumhoz fordulhat a panaszt as eljarasra jogosult szerv a 2004 evi XXIX tv 141-143 $-aiban foglaltak szerint biralja el.
indokla
a benyujtott vizumkerelem vizsgalata soran megallapistast nyert
a kerelmezo nem tejesitette a 2007. evi I torveny 4 (1) bekezdeseben foglalt felteteleket
a fentiekre tekintettel a tenyallasnak a kozigazgatasi hastoagi eljaras es szolgaltatas altalanos szabalyairol szolo 2004 evi CXL torveny (a tovabbiakban : ket) 50 $-ban foglaltak szerint hataroztam 71 (1) bekezdesnek megfeleloen a rendelkezo reszben foglaltak szerint hataroztam az eljaras igazgatasi szolgaltatasi dijanak merteket a kulfoldiek beutazasaval es tartozkodasaval kapcsolatos eljarasok dijarol szolo 28/2007. (v.31) IRM rendelet melleklete alapjan allapitottam meg
hatosagom hataskoret es illetekesseget a vhr 7. (b) pontja illetve a 8 (1) bekezdese allapitja meg
keszult :2 peldanyban