ESC

Click the "allow" button if you want to receive important news and updates from immigrationboards.com


Immigrationboards.com: Immigration, work visa and work permit discussion board

Welcome to immigrationboards.com!

Login Register Do not show

Visa Outcome - Overstay and Work Illegal - 320.11 Rule

Family member & Ancestry immigration; don't post other immigration categories, please!
Marriage | Unmarried Partners | Fiancé | Ancestry

Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator

Locked
charlotterahman
Junior Member
Posts: 56
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 11:40 am
Location: Essex
Contact:

Visa Outcome - Overstay and Work Illegal - 320.11 Rule

Post by charlotterahman » Wed Mar 07, 2012 5:55 pm

Hi, my husband overstayed his student visa and worked illegally for 11 months. We have submitted our spouse visa in Bangladesh. We are now waiting for the outcome. Could anyone just explain a bit more clearly what the rule 320.11 is, if you get refused on that can they solely refuse on the basis of working illegally or does it have to relate to a problem with his current visa application, for example not enough communication means the marriage doesn't look genuine. Or can they just say refused for rule 320.11 due to previous history. Hope someone understands what I mean, thanks!

derlin
Member
Posts: 125
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 3:45 pm

Re: Visa Outcome - Overstay and Work Illegal - 320.11 Rule

Post by derlin » Wed Mar 07, 2012 9:06 pm

charlotterahman wrote:Hi, my husband overstayed his student visa and worked illegally for 11 months. We have submitted our spouse visa in Bangladesh. We are now waiting for the outcome. Could anyone just explain a bit more clearly what the rule 320.11 is, if you get refused on that can they solely refuse on the basis of working illegally or does it have to relate to a problem with his current visa application, for example not enough communication means the marriage doesn't look genuine. Or can they just say refused for rule 320.11 due to previous history. Hope someone understands what I mean, thanks!
His immigration history and conduct are likely to be considered by the immigration officer.

charlotterahman
Junior Member
Posts: 56
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 11:40 am
Location: Essex
Contact:

Post by charlotterahman » Wed Mar 07, 2012 9:10 pm

But can they only refuse on that 320.11 rule , or does there have to be another problem with our application like lack of funds, something wrong with accommodation, etc. Or they can just say refused on rule 320.11 for aggravating circumstances?

Greenie
Respected Guru
Posts: 7374
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 9:45 pm
United Kingdom

Post by Greenie » Wed Mar 07, 2012 11:09 pm

charlotterahman wrote:But can they only refuse on that 320.11 rule , or does there have to be another problem with our application like lack of funds, something wrong with accommodation, etc. Or they can just say refused on rule 320.11 for aggravating circumstances?
they can refuse solely on the grounds of 320(11). See general grounds for refusing

vinny
Moderator
Posts: 33338
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 8:58 pm

Post by vinny » Wed Mar 07, 2012 11:27 pm

This is not intended to be legal or professional advice in any jurisdiction. Please click on any given links for further information. Refer to the source of any quotes.
We do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children.

charlotterahman
Junior Member
Posts: 56
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 11:40 am
Location: Essex
Contact:

Post by charlotterahman » Sun Mar 11, 2012 11:21 am

Can they refuse us in an appeal if his just refused on 320.11, its hard to argue that point in the visa. You cant change previous history?

Locked