- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
With the minimal amount of information you have provided no-one can answer you.vladislav wrote:Hello
I have a question concerning the naturalisation.
As far as I remember it was said on the UKBA website,
that there is a kind of prerequisite for someone(EEA) who wants to be eligible for naturalisation.
The prerequisite is not having used some fundings or loans.
I cannot find that point on the UKBA website anymore.
Does it changed?
zheni wrote:I think what you may be referring to is rather the requirement for EEA nationals not to be an unreasonable burden to public funds. This is still on the website but under a different section.
It means that UKBA should not issue a registration certificate in the first place to someone who relies on public funds but as an EU national they can still live in the UK.vladislav wrote:zheni wrote:I think what you may be referring to is rather the requirement for EEA nationals not to be an unreasonable burden to public funds. This is still on the website but under a different section.
exactly, this is what I meant.
I found something on their website, but I am not sure If I understood it right.
May be some could help me.
There it is said:
EEA nationals who are in the UK as self-sufficient persons and students should be able to
support themselves without public funds. Such persons are only able to claim public funds
without losing their right of residence if they are able to demonstrate that they are not an
unreasonable burden on the state. To establish whether an EEA national is an unreasonable
burden on the state each case would need to be assessed on an individual basis. If the EEA
national is claiming public funds after having been in the UK for some time, the fact that s/he
had been self sufficient would be a factor in determining whether the burden is reasonable, as
would the length of time that s/he is likely to be in receipt of public funds. Although an EEA
national in this situation would be regarded as having a right of residence even though s/he was
in receipt of public funds, it would not be appropriate to issue him/her with a registration
certificate.
what does the bold mean?
Isn´t the registration certificate a very important dosument if you want to be naturalized?
No it's not. Documentations under the EEA regulations are optional. A residence card simply confirms the existence of a right, it does not confer a right.Isn´t the registration certificate a very important dosument if you want to be naturalized?
Jambo wrote:No it's not. Documentations under the EEA regulations are optional. A residence card simply confirms the existence of a right, it does not confer a right.Isn´t the registration certificate a very important dosument if you want to be naturalized?
One can apply for naturalisation without a RC. What is needed is to prove exercising treaty rights.
The bold section just highlights the EEA national who do not work should not totally rely on public funds.
Maybe the UKBA website can help here.vladislav wrote:Hmm.
This is contrary to zhenis posting.
Unfortunetaly i don´t know what is wright and what not.
Residence documents for European nationals wrote:Do you need to apply?
Under European law, you do not need to obtain documentation confirming your right of residence in the UK if you are a national of a country in the EEA.
What are you concerned about? Are you a student who receives funding? Then this is not considered public funds. Public funds are benefits.so what is the deal about that registration certificate?