- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
This understanding is incorrect. You can be away from UK for a max of 180 days in the 5 yr period that you'd claim for ILR. If you have been away from UK for more than 180 days, your ILR application might be rejected. The option available would be to extend your Tier 1 leave to remain and apply for ILR claiming a continuous 5 yr period in which your total leaves are less than 180 days and there are no consecutive 90 day leave periods.- you must not be away from the UK for more than 183 days in a year
Longer discretionary absences in cases where continuous residence has been brokenbkchow wrote:Hello
I have accepted a contract agreed and paid in the UK. However, part of the project I am working on requires me to travel outside the UK for 3 weeks every month, with 1 week based back in the UK. This could be ongoing for a year, maybe two if I am renewed on the contract.
I know about the following:
- you must not be away from the UK on a consecutive 90 days or more
- you must not be away from the UK for more than 183 days in a year
- there is allowance for being away on business trips but this is at the discretion of the immigration officers
How can I prevent/resolve any potential issues with applying for my ILR in 3 years time if the UKBA claim I broke their rules even though I am genuinely away for work reasons?
Has anyone had similar experiences working for a UK company but having to travel significantly for their work? What was the response by UKBA?
Many thanks in advance!
BK
any time mate but speak to an experienced consultant as well, there are a lot of grey areasbkchow wrote:Thanks all for your quick responses.
Manka, your response gives me the best hope!
I do not think it will be difficult to ask my employer to write a letter. However, the part where it states 'serious implications' will be the deciding factor. That is open to interpretation and as they say, everyone is 'expendable' which means if I didn't do the job, there will be someone else who can take over more or less.