- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, Administrator
Most Tier 1 applicants would have had enough leave or have applied before 5th April for extensions.Surely, there are others in similar situations.
No, there isn't unfortunately.There must be a way around?
It is not HO's responsibility to inform every single applicant. The onus is on the applicant to ensure they are aware of any changes, restrictions etc and to comply. The Tier 1 change has been known for quite some time and has been in the press. The majority of migrants know that HO changes things frequently.I was not made aware by UKBA on change of rules
Unlikely because if you are successful, which I doubt, you will be on a new 5 or 10 year route to ILR, starting again from scratch. HO is aware of the abuse regarding applications based on what you are proposing as people just use it to 'cover their shortfall'. These applications now have a significant cost associated with them plus the NHS surcharge. If you don't qualify for this route, it will likely be an outright refusal and appeal rights might not be relevant as your justification is weak and by then your current leave will have expired.What I am trying to ascertain is if the appeal period could be counted towards legal residence in UK and count towards ILTR?
You can disagree all you wish and have many petitions for this and that but HO, unfortunately for some, holds all the cards and can make changes as they see fit. This applies to any country in the world, situations change.I disagree with @cr001 that we had onus on checking, when home office gave validity till certain date they should not take away right to extend till that.
Many people rushed to get a Tier 1 General visa before that short lived, easy to get visa was closed, even thought they didn't intend to use that visa in the near future. It's not the Home Offices fault if people thought that extensions would continue forever on a defunct visa. There has been plenty of news on this and people have a duty to keep up with any changes and that includes any other law changes too.abhisheks9 wrote:Extremely sorry @pranvayu
I disagree with @cr001 that we had onus on checking, when home office gave validity till certain date they should not take away right to extend till that.
Agree completely Petaltop - ignorance is no defence, particularly where HO is concerned.Petaltop wrote:Many people rushed to get a Tier 1 General visa before that short lived, easy to get visa was closed, even thought they didn't intend to use that visa in the near future. It's not the Home Offices fault if people thought that extensions would continue forever on a defunct visa. There has been plenty of news on this and people have a duty to keep up with any changes and that includes any other law changes too.
Try telling this to the spouses and children of ILR/British Citizens who struggle to meet the new requirements post July 2012. There are cut backs and changes across ALL UK visa categories.home office are discriminatory towards PBS in general and totally against tier-1 general applicants in particular
@ CR001 - Just out of curiosity, what is your opinion on the HSMP forum Judicial Review and the high courts ruling in favour of the HSMP forum on 8th April 2008 against the changes to the new extention test brought in by the then UKBA/Home office ?You can disagree all you wish and have many petitions for this and that but HO, unfortunately for some, holds all the cards and can make changes as they see fit.