As usual, when the press publish anything to do with "EU" immigration policy, you can assume that they mean "Schengen" immigration policy. Despite over a decade of Schengen the general public still seem unable to distinguish the two.
It's not only the general public, I'm afraid. The Citizen's Signpost Service also confuses both.
HMRC's loss of 25 million records is evidence that the government can not be trusted with biometric information, and the UK national ID scheme is untenable..
It's beyond me how people in the UK have not taken to the streets to oppose the scheme to create the greatest police state in history. I have a good mind when the time comes to refuse to give the information they request. I'd love to see what happens.
They do all this for the UK visas and then announce prodly that maybe 10 visa requests were not even fraudulent, but from people who has already applied before. No numbers were given, but it was clear it was not significative. So now, people who live in Magadan (almost across the Bering Strait) Will ned to travel to Moscow to apply for Schengen visas. Won't it just be simpler to forbid people to travel?
Now, suppose all this is done and someone cracks the computer code and changes your fingerprints for those of someone else, some wanted person, while this wanted person becomes you? Creepy, isn't it? Fingerprints don't lie...