- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, Administrator
Yes it does.fjk wrote:This thread is quite out dates. My question is, does 6/12 months rule still apply?
As does the genuine visitor 'test'.CR001 wrote:Yes it does.fjk wrote:This thread is quite out dates. My question is, does 6/12 months rule still apply?
If the Immigration Officer at the airport comes to the conclusion that the visitor is residing in the UK in the guise of a visit visa, they can cancel the visit visa on the spot and have them sent back to their country of origin. As that would be on their record, that would also make it very difficult if not impossible for them to get a visit visa in the future. They would then have to miss out on the important occasions in their grandchildren's lives.The applicant must satisfy the decision maker that they are a genuine visitor. This means that the applicant:
(a) will leave the UK at the end of their visit; and
(b) will not live in the UK for extended periods through frequent or successive visits, or make the UK their main home; and
(c) is genuinely seeking entry for a purpose that is permitted by the visitor routes (these are listed in Appendices 3, 4 and 5); and
(d) will not undertake any prohibited activities set out in V 4.5 – V 4.10; and
(e) must have sufficient funds to cover all reasonable costs in relation to their visit without working or accessing public funds. This includes the cost of the return or onward journey, any costs relating to dependants, and the cost of planned activities such as private medical treatment.
Anything in the link that was provided not clear?secret.simon wrote:Strictly speaking, there is no 6/12 rule. However, the visitor is expected to be visiting and not residing in the UK in guise of a visit visa. They are also expected to be spending more time in their country of origin than in the UK.
"4.2 (a) (c) (e) of Appendix V, Immigration Rules of Visitors" states:If the Immigration Officer at the airport comes to the conclusion that the visitor is residing in the UK in the guise of a visit visa, they can cancel the visit visa on the spot and have them sent back to their country of origin. As that would be on their record, that would also make it very difficult if not impossible for them to get a visit visa in the future. They would then have to miss out on the important occasions in their grandchildren's lives.The applicant must satisfy the decision maker that they are a genuine visitor. This means that the applicant:
(a) will leave the UK at the end of their visit; and
(b) will not live in the UK for extended periods through frequent or successive visits, or make the UK their main home; and
(c) is genuinely seeking entry for a purpose that is permitted by the visitor routes (these are listed in Appendices 3, 4 and 5); and
(d) will not undertake any prohibited activities set out in V 4.5 – V 4.10; and
(e) must have sufficient funds to cover all reasonable costs in relation to their visit without working or accessing public funds. This includes the cost of the return or onward journey, any costs relating to dependants, and the cost of planned activities such as private medical treatment.
There have been threads from other people who have been refused visit visas after repeatedly staying in the UK for six months every year in the recent past. Look in the forums for those stories/threads.
So that your parents can come for the important occasions, such as birth of their grandchildren and other important family occasions, I would suggest rationing their visits to much less than six months in the year. Try something like a month every six months or so.