- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha
Hi kapsb80,kapsb80 wrote:Hi ShaDP,ShaDP wrote:Hi,
I received a response for my complaint to the UKBA stating that, ''they are a number of checks that must be completed before a decision can be reached, including some with authorities outside UKVI & these can take some time to complete''.
This is really ridiculous, the way they slide away from everything. My interview was held on the 10th of November & my application was posted on the 04th of February 2016, 15 months now & they are saying that they are still doing checksMP letter really didn't help I guess, as no response was received for that.
This wait is too much. I guess no one has received a response after interview?
Thanks
Do you have any TAX amendments? If yes, then how many?
regards,
Hi sajidkanwal,sajidkanwal wrote:ILR application Set O
Submitted on 23 may 2016
Biometric in June 2016
02 November 2016 received a letter that is say my application taking long time and I will receive an interview letter later
On 17 March 2017 I received an email for interview will be on 06 April 2017
On interview day asked routine questions and asked my personal bank statements of 2nd account.
Status is waiting
18 May 2017 I called in home office and they told me my application is still under process.
I have completed 10years , Now today 19 May 2017 I went on appointment in Croydon to Vary my application. They received set LR application and told me they could not make a decision today because they don't have my original documents, they will told me soon hopefully positive.
ITEXPERT wrote:Here is update
Wondering if anyone is in similar situation.
Applied for ILR set o 1 year ago at PEO. Declared that tax were amended before application and provided valid reason for amendment. they kept it for further checks. After 10 months MP contacted UKVI and within a week they send refusal. 322-5 and 245cd. They still call it dishonesty even declared it to ukvi that taxes are amended and everything upto date with hmrc. Prepared AR and they retained same refusal but removed bit like income declared to hmrc for every year. They also acknowlwdged my exceptional circumstances but still retained same decision. 10 years completed 8 months ago but was confident that set o will go through which unfortunately didn't.
Now friends please advise if should go for LR PEO and explain that no dishonesty or deception on my behalf as everything was in order and decleared??or send PAP and follow JR?? or to proceed with both? Sorry for my bit long story. Quick reply would be greaty appreciated.
ITEXPERT wrote:Here is update
Wondering if anyone is in similar situation.
Applied for ILR set o 1 year ago at PEO. Declared that tax were amended before application and provided valid reason for amendment. they kept it for further checks. After 10 months MP contacted UKVI and within a week they send refusal. 322-5 and 245cd. They still call it dishonesty even declared it to ukvi that taxes are amended and everything upto date with hmrc. Prepared AR and they retained same refusal but removed bit like income declared to hmrc for every year. They also acknowlwdged my exceptional circumstances but still retained same decision. 10 years completed 8 months ago but was confident that set o will go through which unfortunately didn't.
Now friends please advise if should go for LR PEO and explain that no dishonesty or deception on my behalf as everything was in order and decleared??or send PAP and follow JR?? or to proceed with both? Sorry for my bit long story. Quick reply would be greaty appreciated.
Hi Khan Sab,siftkhanz wrote:[quote
Hi
To be honest I am in the same situation as you difference being cw not satisfied my income in genuine, I have met couple of lawyers and they both suggested "to file JR and make fresh application because if you go for fresh application without filing JR this means you accept the decision of original caseworker so it is best to do both parallel to each other"
but then again every one have their own opinion I am personally going to do both just trying to find a good decent lawyer who is not greedy at the same time
good luck
Chief786 wrote:
Hi Khan Sab,
If you don't mind can you please share what points they mentioned for rejection and plz give us few details about your case, tax, amendments etc. It would be a great help. Thanks
Hi Khan Sab,siftkhanz wrote:Chief786 wrote:
Hi Khan Sab,
If you don't mind can you please share what points they mentioned for rejection and plz give us few details about your case, tax, amendments etc. It would be a great help. Thanks
Hi Chief Sahab
Wohi same kahani dost ... income is not genuine, refused because cw is not satisfied under section 19 i and 19 j
Tax amendment for 1 year done before sending application, no tax due after amendment confirmed by HMRC
AR refused on the same ground
if you want to ask something specific about application feel free to ask ...
take care
Thanks for your response. I am thinking about the same PAP and fresh application at PEO. Heard some suspension stories but it's all down to luck.siftkhanz wrote:ITEXPERT wrote:Here is update
Wondering if anyone is in similar situation.
Applied for ILR set o 1 year ago at PEO. Declared that tax were amended before application and provided valid reason for amendment. they kept it for further checks. After 10 months MP contacted UKVI and within a week they send refusal. 322-5 and 245cd. They still call it dishonesty even declared it to ukvi that taxes are amended and everything upto date with hmrc. Prepared AR and they retained same refusal but removed bit like income declared to hmrc for every year. They also acknowlwdged my exceptional circumstances but still retained same decision. 10 years completed 8 months ago but was confident that set o will go through which unfortunately didn't.
Now friends please advise if should go for LR PEO and explain that no dishonesty or deception on my behalf as everything was in order and decleared??or send PAP and follow JR?? or to proceed with both? Sorry for my bit long story. Quick reply would be greaty appreciated.
Hi
To be honest I am in the same situation as you difference being cw not satisfied my income in genuine, I have met couple of lawyers and they both suggested "to file JR and make fresh application because if you go for fresh application without filing JR this means you accept the decision of original caseworker so it is best to do both parallel to each other"
but then again every one have their own opinion I am personally going to do both just trying to find a good decent lawyer who is not greedy at the same time
good luck