secret.simon wrote: ↑Sat May 02, 2020 7:32 pm
Ram_0073 wrote: ↑Sat May 02, 2020 6:47 pm
I mean it got 4 Admin Reviews not JR.
OK. What were the gaps in time between the various admin review refusals and the next admin review filing?
Providing the actual dates would help us advise you better.
Immigration History -
1) I arrived in the United Kingdom on 22 September 2008 as a General Student visa (entry clearance), with leave valid until 28 February 2010.
2) On 26 February 2010, I submitted an in time application for leave to remain as a Tier-4(General)student. My leave was granted and valid from 29 April 2010 till 31 July 2010.
3) On 30 July 2010, I made an in time application for leave to remain as a Tier-1 Highly skilled (PSW) migrant. On 23 August 2010, I was granted further leave to remain under Tier-1 category which was valid until 23 August 2012.
4) I made an in time leave to remain application under Tier-4(General) category on 22 August 2012, this was granted by the respondent and was valid from 19 October 2012 to 29 December 2014.
5) On 18 October 2014, I submitted a leave to remain extension application under Tier-1 Highly Skilled Entrepreneur. I was granted leave to remain on 20 February 2014 until 20 February 2017.
6) On 08 September 2014, the appellant entered the UK as a dependent of mine, and continued her staying in the UK lawfully until 13 September 2018.
7) On 1 December 2015, I applied for a replacement Biometric Residence Permit card as I had lost the previous permit issued to me. A replacement permit was issued to me by the respondent,which was valid from 15 January 2016 to 20 February 2017.

On 20 February 2017, I submitted an extension of Tier-1 Entrepreneur leave, and this was refused by the respondent 29 March 2018 (received on 03 April 2018) with a right to request an administrative review of the decision.
9) I exercised my right to request an administrative review of the 29 March 2018 decision within 14 days(administrative review submitted on 13 April 2018).
10) On 11 May 2018, the respondent refused my administrative review and came up with a new decision by amending his 29 March decision. I was given a new right to request an administrative review of the 11 May 2018 decision (decision received 17 May 2018).
11) I exercised my right to request an administrative review of the 11 May 2018 decision within 14 days(administrative review submitted 30 May 2018).
12) On 10 August 2018(received on 13 August 2018), the respondent amended his 11 May 2018 decision and refused my 30 May 2018 administrative request. I, once again, was given aright to request an administrative review.
13) Once again, I exercised my right to request an administrative review of the respondent’s 10 August 2018 decision, and this was submitted on 24 August 2018 (within 14 days after the decision received).
14) On 13 September 2018(received on 14 September), the respondent refused my 24 August 2018 administrative review application, and this time the respondent maintained his previous decision.
15) On 20 September 2018, I submitted indefinite leave to remain application under 10 years’ continuous lawful residency and human rights to the Home Office.
16) On 18 September 2018, I made an application for leave to remain under my family and private life grounds. This was refused with an in-country right of appeal on 12 July 2019.
17) The respondent refused my settlement and human rights application on 18 February 2019 with an in-country right of appeal.
18) On 28 February 2019, I appealed against the respondent’s 18 February 2019 decision (“The Decision”) to the First Tier Tribunal IAC. This was refused by the First Tier Tribunal, and thereafter I sought First Tier Tribunal’s permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal, which is currently pending and undecided by the learned Tribunal.