- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha
Yes. It also is not a 'new rule'. It has been in place since December 2014 for Citizenship applications.Does this new rule affect him?
Highly likely to be refused. He will likely only be able to apply in 2024, 10 years from the date he got his spouse visa.Can he apply?
A single overstay of under 28 days. The OP's husband overstayed for about four years.
Good character guidance wrote:Prior to 24 November 2016, migrants were permitted a grace period of 28 days after the expiry of any leave during which they could make a further application to renew their leave without being penalised as an overstayer.
Changes to the Immigration Rules on 24 November 2016 abolished this 28-day grace period, and now provide for current overstaying to be disregarded only in a very limited number of scenarios. Otherwise it is a ground for refusal. For further information see applications from overstayers.
Where a person overstayed at some point in the 10 years prior to an application for citizenship, discretion to overlook this breach will normally only be considered if it is the sole adverse factor weighing against the person’s good character; and
• the person’s application for leave to remain was made before 24 November 2016 and within 28 days of the expiry of their previous leave, or
• the person’s application for leave to remain was made on or after 24 November 2016, and the application did not fall for refusal on the grounds of
overstaying because an exception under paragraph 39E of the Immigration Rules applied, or
• the period without leave was not the fault of the applicant, for example where it arose from a Home Office decision to refuse which is subsequently
withdrawn or quashed or which the courts have required the Home Office to reconsider.
he can apply. But it is highly likely that the application will be refused. And there is no refund for a refused application.
An immigration breach relating to lawful residence includes overstaying, illegal entry and absconding.
Prior to 28 June 2022, immigration breaches in the 5-year period before a citizenship application were normally a reason for refusal of citizenship on the grounds of not meeting the lawful residence requirement set out in section 4 and section 6 (read with paragraphs 1 and 2 of Schedule 1) of the British Nationality Act (BNA) 1981. If the breach was in the 10-year period before a citizenship application, it was normally grounds for refusal of citizenship on the basis of not meeting the good character requirement.
Schedule 1 of the Nationality and Borders Act 2022 (NABA 2022) amended the requirements for naturalisation and registration for British citizenship under sections 4(2), 6(1) and 6(2) of the BNA 1981, so that a person can be treated as meeting the lawful residence requirement during the qualifying period without further enquiry where they hold indefinite leave to enter or remain in the UK. This change commenced on 28 June 2022.
This change does not extend to applications to naturalise as a British overseas territory citizen.
To align with changes to the qualifying period, where a person has committed immigration breaches relating to:
may be disregarded when assessing good character during the 10-year period prior to the application, but only where all of the following factors apply:
- illegal entry
- absconding
- overstaying
- failing to comply with the requirements of the EEA Regulations 2016, as saved
Therefore, applications where it remains appropriate to consider immigration breaches relating to lawful residence, alongside other good character factors, may include but are not limited to:
- the person is applying for naturalisation as a British citizen, or registration as a British citizen under s.4(2), 6(1) or 6(2) of the BNA 1981 after 28 June 2022
- that person holds indefinite leave to enter or remain (ILE or ILR, also known as settlement) in the UK
- no concerns (for example, regarding the person’s character) have arisen since the grant of settlement which might cast doubt on the decision
Immigration breaches that do not relate to lawful residence (for example working in breach of conditions, hiring illegal workers, or failure to observe reporting requirements) must still be considered.
- where historic information has come to light which, had it been known at the time of granting settlement, may have led to refusal
- where something occurred after the grant of settlement to indicate revocation of that status may be appropriate
- applications to naturalise as a British overseas territory citizen
See Naturalisation as British citizen by discretion
HelloYazzy wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 2:49 pmMy husband originally came to the UK on a visitor visa in 2008 and overstayed until 2012. He voluntarily left the UK in 2012. We got married and his spouse visa was originally refused because of his overstay history but when we appealed in court it was allowed. He received his ILR residence permit card today. I was looking to apply for his neutralisation when i came across the good character overstay issue. The 10 year wait.
Does this new rule affect him?
Can he apply?