- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
kashifmania wrote:Hi,
I applied for Tier 1 visa before the visa expiry date but the application was returned because the bank didn't process the payment. The 2nd application was made within 28 days of visa expiry date.
My employer has dismissed me and my employment will be terminated if I do not show them that I have the right to work within 48hrs. ending on 26/09/2013.
Please could somebody guide/advice me what to do?????
According to my employer when they did the ECS they were given the information that my valid application (2nd application as the 1st was declined due to non payment of fees) was received after my visa had expired and thus I do not have the right to work as I have over stayed....
Can I challenge this? Please advice me
santosh_mahaveer wrote:timeline of events
psw expiry 9th feb 2013
applied for tier 1 enterprenuer along with dependent 8th feb 2013 (first application)
acknowledgement recieved 10 days later
whole application sent back to us due to payment issue 29 march 2013
rules changed on april 6 (increase in fees, change in the application form and policy guidance)
reapplied with the new form and fees 23 april 2013 (second application this time with bank drafts instead of debit card details )
acknowledgement received in about 2 weeks.
Biometric invitation received end of may
biometrics given 1st june 2013
additional documents sent 5th aug 2013 (letter from barclays that the money was there and no attempt from ukba was made, and the copy of the payment page of the first application showing we filled the correct debit card details)
rejection received on as application considered invalid as the second one was submitted 28 days after visa expired. 13th sept 2013. no right of appeal and passports withheld with immigration control.
Senior members please shed some light on my situation.
Letter to SIA is likely to have been written when they refuse your first application and its usually very difficult to deal with SIA in such circumstances because of the bureaucracy involved.urfipk wrote:Same thing happened to me . I have reapplied with a cover letter explaining the whole situtaion . They have refused my visa but with some other reasons and give me right of appeal as well. They wrote me in refusal letter that if I appeal my previous leave to remain will be extended with same terms and conditions becoz of section 3c.
but they wrote to SIA that I dont have right to work. I did not understand
Their decision. If I dont have right to work then y they mention in notice of decision that if u appeal then ur previous leave to remain will be extended?
Did you apply for reconsideration of your first application or you made a fresh application?urfipk wrote:Same thing happened to me . I have reapplied with a cover letter explaining the whole situtaion . They have refused my visa but with some other reasons and give me right of appeal as well. They wrote me in refusal letter that if I appeal my previous leave to remain will be extended with same terms and conditions becoz of section 3c.
but they wrote to SIA that I dont have right to work. I did not understand
Their decision. If I dont have right to work then y they mention in notice of decision that if u appeal then ur previous leave to remain will be extended?
They send my all documents back with my application and I have send them my application with new fee and write them to consider my application in a date when I applied first timeOlasunkanmi wrote:Did you apply for reconsideration of your first application or you made a fresh application?urfipk wrote:Same thing happened to me . I have reapplied with a cover letter explaining the whole situtaion . They have refused my visa but with some other reasons and give me right of appeal as well. They wrote me in refusal letter that if I appeal my previous leave to remain will be extended with same terms and conditions becoz of section 3c.Zbut they wrote to SIA that I dont have right to work. I did not understand
Their decision. If I dont have right to work then y they mention in notice of decision that if u appeal then ur previous leave to remain will be extended?
Start of the 28 days was when the initial in-time application was (perhaps incorrectly) declared invalid.santosh_mahaveer wrote:timeline of events
psw expiry 9th feb 2013
applied for tier 1 enterprenuer along with dependent 8th feb 2013 (first application)
acknowledgement recieved 10 days later
whole application sent back to us due to payment issue 29 march 2013
rules changed on april 6 (increase in fees, change in the application form and policy guidance)
reapplied with the new form and fees 23 april 2013 (second application this time with bank drafts instead of debit card details )
acknowledgement received in about 2 weeks.
Biometric invitation received end of may
biometrics given 1st june 2013
additional documents sent 5th aug 2013 (letter from barclays that the money was there and no attempt from ukba was made, and the copy of the payment page of the first application showing we filled the correct debit card details)
rejection received on as application considered invalid as the second one was submitted 28 days after visa expired. 13th sept 2013. no right of appeal and passports withheld with immigration control.
Senior members please shed some light on my situation.
applied on 17/05/2013 visa expired on 19/05/2013. application returned on 30/05/2013 and 2nd application made on 04/06/2013urfipk wrote:kashifmania wrote:Hi,
I applied for Tier 1 visa before the visa expiry date but the application was returned because the bank didn't process the payment. The 2nd application was made within 28 days of visa expiry date.
My employer has dismissed me and my employment will be terminated if I do not show them that I have the right to work within 48hrs. ending on 26/09/2013.
Please could somebody guide/advice me what to do?????
According to my employer when they did the ECS they were given the information that my valid application (2nd application as the 1st was declined due to non payment of fees) was received after my visa had expired and thus I do not have the right to work as I have over stayed....
Can I challenge this? Please advice me
When you apply and have you got ur decision?
Overstayer. No Section 3C/3D. No right of appeal. No right to work. Plus possible re-entry ban, subject to concession.kashifmania wrote:thanks for your advice and comments. Im still waiting for the decision...
could somebody please advice me what is my status as I applied within 28days of my visa expiration? Mostly people commented on my post applied after 28days of visa expiration thus I believe 3C didnt apply on them and in some instances they were not given the right to appeal too.
Thanks
vinny wrote:Overstayer. No Section 3C. No right of appeal. No right to work.kashifmania wrote:thanks for your advice and comments. Im still waiting for the decision...
could somebody please advice me what is my status as I applied within 28days of my visa expiration? Mostly people commented on my post applied after 28days of visa expiration thus I believe 3C didnt apply on them and in some instances they were not given the right to appeal too.
Thanks
You stated that your first application was returned without payment been taken, do you have proof that UKBA didn't make attempt to take payment or was it your mistake?kashifmania wrote:vinny wrote:Overstayer. No Section 3C. No right of appeal. No right to work.kashifmania wrote:thanks for your advice and comments. Im still waiting for the decision...
could somebody please advice me what is my status as I applied within 28days of my visa expiration? Mostly people commented on my post applied after 28days of visa expiration thus I believe 3C didnt apply on them and in some instances they were not given the right to appeal too.
Thanks
Thanks vinny! what do you advice me to do? what should be my course of action?
Hi legal solution, How can I prove this? I gave my solicitor letter stating this along with the basnet case but when HO was contact by my employer they are saying the same thing.... NOT ALLOWED TO WORKLEGAL SOLUTION wrote:in accordance with the rules set by basnet case, you have a valid application and have right to work under sec3 of the immigration rules
Hi Vinny, by invalid application do you mean the fee part or the documentation part of the application? and what if there was a mistake in giving the card number from my side?vinny wrote:Yes. They have to prove that your initial in-time application was invalid.
@ Famous.famous wrote:Santosh, my question wud be why did u apply right at the end of ur visa? why not play it safe and apply atleast one month before visa expired? its mroe sensible to leave margin of error and avoid this hassle. half of the problems ppl at this forum create for themselves. u dig a hole and fall in the ditch urself and then whine.
thanks! what do you suggest what can I do? my employment is almost terminated and HO is not co-operating at all. same old story....Lola22 wrote:@ Famous.famous wrote:Santosh, my question wud be why did u apply right at the end of ur visa? why not play it safe and apply atleast one month before visa expired? its mroe sensible to leave margin of error and avoid this hassle. half of the problems ppl at this forum create for themselves. u dig a hole and fall in the ditch urself and then whine.
Famous, how can you make a statement like that?
What type of judge would you be?
Am sure they all want to play safe if they have the opportunity to do so. Nobody will pray to have UKBA problem. True, that most of the problems are caused by simple or common mistake but most of it is due to ignorance or inaccurate information. They have acknowledged that they have made a mistake and they need your help.
If you can help, help. Don't make them feel more miserable.
any update from you santosh? what have you done for your case?santosh_mahaveer wrote:timeline of events
psw expiry 9th feb 2013
applied for tier 1 enterprenuer along with dependent 8th feb 2013 (first application)
acknowledgement recieved 10 days later
whole application sent back to us due to payment issue 29 march 2013
rules changed on april 6 (increase in fees, change in the application form and policy guidance)
reapplied with the new form and fees 23 april 2013 (second application this time with bank drafts instead of debit card details )
acknowledgement received in about 2 weeks.
Biometric invitation received end of may
biometrics given 1st june 2013
additional documents sent 5th aug 2013 (letter from barclays that the money was there and no attempt from ukba was made, and the copy of the payment page of the first application showing we filled the correct debit card details)
rejection received on as application considered invalid as the second one was submitted 28 days after visa expired. 13th sept 2013. no right of appeal and passports withheld with immigration control.
Senior members please shed some light on my situation.
Yes. However, if it was your error on your side, then they were correct in declaring the application as invalid.kashifmania wrote:Hi Vinny, by invalid application do you mean the fee part or the documentation part of the application? and what if there was a mistake in giving the card number from my side?vinny wrote:Yes. They have to prove that your initial in-time application was invalid.