- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
LilyLalilu wrote:If her parents werent settled in the UK when shes was born she has no automatic claim to BC. Where does she live now/how long did she live in the UK? She may have a lifelong entitlement to registration if she lived here for the first 10 years of her life..
Thank you for the link, this leads to few more questionsalterhase58 wrote:Maybe this document gives some pointers:
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/s ... lomats.pdf
A foreign mission is an embassy of a non-Commonwealth country. A Commonwealth mission is a High Commission of a Commonwealth country.bhai86 wrote:3)What is a Foreign and Commonwealth mission?
secret.simon wrote:People who have diplomatic immunity while in the UK are not considered settled in the UK while they have such immunity and children born to such parents are excluded from acquiring citizenship at birth (Section 50(4) of the British Nationality Act 1981). The law was the same even before 1981(see Section 4(a) of the British Nationality Act 1948).
Even if the parents were considered settled in the UK at that time, they would have lost settled status after an absence of two years.
Even if they retained it, your girlfriend could only have been registered as a British citizen if she was under 18 years of age at the time of application for registration, which she no longer is.
So, there is no chance for your girlfriend to acquire British citizenship through her birth in the UK. She will have to go through the relevant PBS or spousal route and naturalise, like most non-EEA migrants on these forums.
As an aside, the same is the situation in most countries of the world. Diplomatic staff (and your rank does not matter) are not subject to the law of the country that they are in and hence can not derive benefits from there either. Even the US, which famously has birthright citizenship, excludes the children of diplomats born in the US from acquiring US citizenship automatically.
A foreign mission is an embassy of a non-Commonwealth country. A Commonwealth mission is a High Commission of a Commonwealth country.bhai86 wrote:3)What is a Foreign and Commonwealth mission?
Unfortunately, she would also fail the 10 years residence entitlement.bhai86 wrote:She is in the UK at the moment on a student visa, she lived about 2.5 years after birth and then left UK since then until coming back to UK again on student visa this year.
I agree, Vinny. I was just trying to figure out what other grounds were there for the lawyer's advice.vinny wrote:Unfortunately, she would also fail the 10 years residence entitlement.bhai86 wrote:She is in the UK at the moment on a student visa, she lived about 2.5 years after birth and then left UK since then until coming back to UK again on student visa this year.
Even if born in the US with a diplomat as a parent, most would agree that she would not be a US citizen. However, there is some confusion.secret.simon wrote:As an aside, the same is the situation in most countries of the world. Diplomatic staff (and your rank does not matter) are not subject to the law of the country that they are in and hence can not derive benefits from there either. Even the US, which famously has birthright citizenship, excludes the children of diplomats born in the US from acquiring US citizenship automatically.
I did come across that article while researching on the OP's question and my understanding of the article is that while children of diplomats born in the US are not entitled to US citizenship, they accidentally get US citizenship due to the lack of co-ordination between state agencies (that register births, etc) and federal agencies (that administer citizenship and passports). But legally, such children are not US citizens, though given that the US passport is conclusive proof (not prima facie proof as the UK passport) of US citizenship, I wonder if it could be argued that merely issuing a US passport to them retrospectively naturalises them.vinny wrote:Even if born in the US with a diplomat as a parent, most would agree that she would not be a US citizen. However, there is some confusion.secret.simon wrote:As an aside, the same is the situation in most countries of the world. Diplomatic staff (and your rank does not matter) are not subject to the law of the country that they are in and hence can not derive benefits from there either. Even the US, which famously has birthright citizenship, excludes the children of diplomats born in the US from acquiring US citizenship automatically.
Thank you guys for the responses. I would like to add that her Grand-dad was born in 1929 in the Mandatory Palestine Territory. If that can lead to any possibility of able to get citizenship or UK ancestry-visa?secret.simon wrote: Reverting to the OP's question, can you think of any grounds for the girlfriend to be eligible for citizenship or even a lower form of visa based on her birth?