- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
It is very difficult to get a visa granted under the so called 7 years rule. Home office probably argue that your child is expected to remain with you and can move to your country. Very few applications have been granted under this1. Apply for Article 8 with my daughter
You have broken your continuous period of stay as you were absent for more than 6 months. Again it will be very very difficult to argue that it was an exceptional circumstance to qualify for 10 year residence.2. Apply for the extension, qualifying for the 10 years (keeping in mind that I was in my country for 9 months due to my mother's bad health)
Just to clarify that the 7 year FLR(FP) that the OP is talking about does not have the requirement for the child to be born in the UK. I think you (Ouflak1) are conflating the 7 year FLR(FP) visa with the 10 year Section 1(4) entitlement to registration for children born in the UK.ouflak1 wrote:Just to elaborate a bit on the seven years child visa, the spirit of this is for a child born in the UK who has only lived in the UK and doesn''t have strong family support.
While your child may have completed her GCSEs in the UK, that is no reason why her education cannot be continued in another country.Immigration Rule 276ADE wrote:The requirements to be met by an applicant for leave to remain on the grounds of private life in the UK are that at the date of application, the applicant:
...
(iv) is under the age of 18 years and has lived continuously in the UK for at least 7 years (discounting any period of imprisonment) and it would not be reasonable to expect the applicant to leave the UK; or...
Paragraph 28 of MA (Pakistan) and Ors vs Upper Tribunal wrote:The decision maker must ask whether, paying proper regard to the best interests of the child and all other relevant considerations bearing upon the public interest, including the conduct and immigration history of the applicant parent or parents, it is not reasonable to expect the child to leave. The fact that the child has been resident for seven years will be a factor which must be given significant weight in the balancing exercise, but it does not otherwise modify or distort the usual article 8 proportionality assessment. That test requires that where the parents have no right to be in the UK that is the basis on which the article 8 proportionality assessment must be made.
Yeah I was only referring to the 'spirit' of the 7 year FLR(FP). It's been left purposely vague without such specific requirements to deal with all sorts of situations a child might find themself in that are completely outside of their control. That's one reason why there are almost zero (and perhaps exactly zero) successful cases where there are two married co-habitating parents. That's considered such a stable environment of support for the child that they should be able to get along in lfie no matter where the family moves to in the world. And certainly they should be able to do well enough if they move back to the country of their, and their parent's, birth where they have lived the majority of their life anyway.secret.simon wrote:Just to clarify that the 7 year FLR(FP) that the OP is talking about does not have the requirement for the child to be born in the UK. I think you (Ouflak1) are conflating the 7 year FLR(FP) visa with the 10 year Section 1(4) entitlement to registration for children born in the UK.ouflak1 wrote:Just to elaborate a bit on the seven years child visa, the spirit of this is for a child born in the UK who has only lived in the UK and doesn''t have strong family support.
Kindly do not post links to other forums. Your detailed explanation of the case is sufficient and very good, thank you.