- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
Well obviously I'd only stay in the UK via legal means, not by overstaying my Tier 4 or anything like that. But I fear if I talk about my plans to find a job in the UK it may muddy the waters.nhan908 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 12, 2017 6:52 pmwhether the applicant intends to comply with the terms of their visa, including the
requirement to leave the UK when their leave comes to an end (or, where lawful and
appropriate, to apply to extend their leave under Tier 4 or to switch to another
immigration route). - pg 137 of the Tier 4 Guidance
I did the same in the interview- I didn't say I want to go back to my home country nor stay in the UK, I said I could go to Germany or the US but the rules clearly also say you can switch to another route (i.e. Tier 2) so I wouldn't be too worried!
Purpose of interview to check either you are genuine student or not, it's just credibility interview. They will just check either have you done research about the uni & degree where you are applying. You should know why you choose uni and course and where your uni is location and which other uni offer such course and why you choose this course, you should also know about tuition fees and accommodation charges and how much you paid and how much balance left and also refund policy.CloudyNow wrote: ↑Tue Sep 12, 2017 4:43 pmI am going to have my interview soon, do you have any tips as to how I should tackle it? I know they ask about future plans but I am not sure how to answer that. I am considering to stay in the UK for a few years at least if I can find a good job after my degree but I am weighing up other options as well.
I've been told by my visa counsellor that they don't want to hear that I might stay in the UK after uni as they might think I am using my Tier 4 as a springboard to permanently settle in the UK. That's not really what's going on; I'm going to the UK for the world-class education it offers and I wouldn't mind staying there for a while if a good work opportunity comes my way.
Should I just say I want to go back to my home country to work? That wouldn't be a lie as that is an option too.
Still waiting for it unfortunatelyCloudyNow wrote: ↑Tue Sep 12, 2017 7:25 pmWell obviously I'd only stay in the UK via legal means, not by overstaying my Tier 4 or anything like that. But I fear if I talk about my plans to find a job in the UK it may muddy the waters.nhan908 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 12, 2017 6:52 pmwhether the applicant intends to comply with the terms of their visa, including the
requirement to leave the UK when their leave comes to an end (or, where lawful and
appropriate, to apply to extend their leave under Tier 4 or to switch to another
immigration route). - pg 137 of the Tier 4 Guidance
I did the same in the interview- I didn't say I want to go back to my home country nor stay in the UK, I said I could go to Germany or the US but the rules clearly also say you can switch to another route (i.e. Tier 2) so I wouldn't be too worried!
Did you successfully get your visa after saying you wanted to go to another country?
This is nonsense. It is perfectly normal and lawful and indeed expected for someone to hope or intend to stay and work in the UK after their studies.
This is dangerous nonsense. You need to show you met the maintenance requirement when you apply. The evidence of this can be dated up to 31 days before the date of application.
I got my visa just a few hours ago, it seems you don't need to worry about that as I got the visa even with what I said, although keep in mind I have a rather strong application from my background etc.nhan908 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 13, 2017 7:00 amStill waiting for it unfortunatelyCloudyNow wrote: ↑Tue Sep 12, 2017 7:25 pmWell obviously I'd only stay in the UK via legal means, not by overstaying my Tier 4 or anything like that. But I fear if I talk about my plans to find a job in the UK it may muddy the waters.nhan908 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 12, 2017 6:52 pmwhether the applicant intends to comply with the terms of their visa, including the
requirement to leave the UK when their leave comes to an end (or, where lawful and
appropriate, to apply to extend their leave under Tier 4 or to switch to another
immigration route). - pg 137 of the Tier 4 Guidance
I did the same in the interview- I didn't say I want to go back to my home country nor stay in the UK, I said I could go to Germany or the US but the rules clearly also say you can switch to another route (i.e. Tier 2) so I wouldn't be too worried!
Did you successfully get your visa after saying you wanted to go to another country?
My visa counsellor works for an agency that is an official representative of my university. She said she has been advising all her students to get their bank statements the day before their appointment and no one ever got a rejection on that basis.sah10406 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 13, 2017 9:49 amThis is nonsense. It is perfectly normal and lawful and indeed expected for someone to hope or intend to stay and work in the UK after their studies.
This is dangerous nonsense. You need to show you met the maintenance requirement when you apply. The evidence of this can be dated up to 31 days before the date of application.
Not sure who your "visa counsellor" works for, but your sponsor university is not going to be amused by applicants getting such dodgy and strange immigration advice.
It is just pointless, but also potentially dangerous. The entry clearance officer is looking for evidence that an applicant has the money when they apply. The evidence of this is normally a bank statement, the closing balance of which can be dated up to 31 days before the date of application. In the application you confirm that you have this evidence. So it is weird to then use a different bank statement in your application, which you clearly did not have when you applied. The application is complicated enough without adding this extra fictitious requirement for an updated bank statement.
As advised on your other topic, if he is already included on the financial sponsorship, that is evidence in itself of his maintenance. Why bring a bank statement into the mix at all, especially one that you have concerns about and especially when the form asks, nay BEGS, applicants to not bog down their application with extra documents?
You are welcome, but I never understood why you insisted on including the bank statements, especially as you had so many doubts and anxieties about them. The sponsor letter was the proof of maintenance, and it would have saved you a lot of stress if you had used it alone.