- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
Errr, no. The requirements are not issued under the Royal Prerogative.AdInfernos wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2017 11:51 amgetting a change in their requirements, which as I understand are set by using Royal Prerogative powers, seems an almost impossible challenge.
Thanks for the clarification. Despite being aware of the 1981 BNA I had for some reason HMPO on my mind. Still, as you say, challenging the ministerial powers for this purpose is impractical. At the end of the day it turns out to be cheaper paying 150ish quid and sitting the b1 exam than taking the Secretary of State to court.secret.simon wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2017 12:42 pmErrr, no. The requirements are not issued under the Royal Prerogative.AdInfernos wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2017 11:51 amgetting a change in their requirements, which as I understand are set by using Royal Prerogative powers, seems an almost impossible challenge.
They are issued by ministers under powers delegated to them by Parliament using legislation. The Immigration Act 1971 and its various amending acts gives ministers powers to define what is and is not acceptable as proof of English skills for the purposes of immigration (for non-EEA citizens only). The British Nationality Act 1981 (as amended) gives ministers similar powers in terms of acquisition of citizenship (naturalisation and registration) - which is not governed by the same laws as immigration.
It is a ministerial power specifically granted to them by Act of Parliament, not one of the Royal Prerogative. (UK citizenship is regulated by Act of Parliament. UK passports are issued under the Royal Prerogative, but that is by the bye).
Ministerial powers, either under Act of Parliament (delegated legislation) or under Royal Prerogative, can be challenged in court. You will however need deep pockets to go through the courts.
True.AdInfernos wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2017 2:02 pmit turns out to be cheaper paying 150ish quid and sitting the b1 exam than taking the Secretary of State to court.
Not sure why you paid this much. It only costs £1282 for citizenship for an adult.
We all have to follow the requirements to qualify for the privilege of British citizenship. Simplyl 'trust the laws and rules' is not sufficient. It is the applicants responsibility to make sure they meet all the requirements, so not sure why you feel your son was 'humiliated' when the form clearly states what the requirements are. It certaily is also not an 'abusive rule' either. Simply get your son to do the test and apply again.He trust British lows and rules and this one is not right . It is not acceptable .
Yes, I'm aware of the costs for non-EU migrants, but overall British immigration-related fees are exorbitant if you compare with those of surrounding countries. For example, naturalisation as a Spanish citizen costs 101 euros. As a French citizen, the fee is 55 euros. And your dependant children also get it with you. In Ireland, naturalisation is closer in price to the UK, but instead of paying for the consideration, most of the money goes towards the naturalisation certificate. This means that if you are rejected, most of the money is refunded.secret.simon wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2017 2:09 pmTrue.AdInfernos wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2017 2:02 pmit turns out to be cheaper paying 150ish quid and sitting the b1 exam than taking the Secretary of State to court.
Also remember that non-EEA immigrants pay over a small fortune to the government for immigration any way. My immigration ten years ago has cost me about £5000-6000 overall and that is as a single person. Fees go up about 20% per annum approximately. So, a family of four (non-EEA migrants) going through immigration now would be expecting to pay something in the region of £18,000 - £20,000 over the whole immigration process. A fee of £150 for the English test does not have that huge an impact if you are already paying that much, as compared to the whole immigration process costing an EEA migrant (and their non-EEA spouse) £65 each - so, just £260 for a family of four, only one of which has to be an EEA citizen - for all five years of immigration.
My son study in the last 7 years here in uk , he has pass all the exams with fantastic grades , at 18 has the right to fill a form for citizinship but he needs to prove he can speack and understand English ?swintooh wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2017 5:14 pmI also think this is pointless. You failed to meet a fundamental (and one of the best explained) requirement and now you want others to sign a petition to do exactly what? Over my odd 20 years long residency in Britain I met practicing doctors and nurses who could not clearly communicate in English, many, many students of local universities who could hardly speak English. I have absolutely no problem with the government imposing language tests on the citizenship applicants. The only thing I can symphatise with is the very high cost of a 5 mins worth of the exam.
I start that already , thank you very much , I really apreciate it .AdInfernos wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2017 4:55 pmPerhaps engaging a few MPs would be more productive, but again, it is unlikely most MPs will be interested in this situation which only affects non-British citizens.
I was sure his Higher English B will be above the 5 minutes test I had B1...AdInfernos wrote: ↑Sat Nov 18, 2017 11:51 amI wholeheartedly agree that evidence of English language should be broader. There are many certifications above the required B1 level that they don't accept. For example, Cambridge First Certificate, CAE, CPE. But also it is obvious that people who are integrated in the education system, as it is the case of your son, do speak English correctly. This also includes those who have attained a Certificate or Diploma of Higher Education, not only a Degree.
Unfortunately getting a change in their requirements, which as I understand are set by using Royal Prerogative powers, seems an almost impossible challenge.
Anyway, your son has been bold making an application that costs £1,282 without checking first that he fulfilled beyond reasonable doubt the documentary requirement for knowledge of the English language.
We all have to follow the requirements to qualify for the privilege of British citizenship. Simplyl 'trust the laws and rules' is not sufficient. It is the applicants responsibility to make sure they meet all the requirements, so not sure why you feel your son was 'humiliated' when the form clearly states what the requirements are.He trust British lows and rules and this one is not right . It is not acceptable .
No it doesn't. For majority of people it costs significantly more than that to go through the process and gain British citizenship.