- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
Are you overseas ?business meeting with my overseas clients and didn't go back to london
They do not have right to visit unannounced and take interviews, they can only turn unannounced if you are doing something not allowed in your visa conditions.marcnath wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2017 7:43 amAre you overseas ?business meeting with my overseas clients and didn't go back to london
While HO has the right to even turn up unannounced, they would not be able to use your absence as a reason for rejection.
However, as the office mentioned, it may further delay the application so if I was in your place, I would have rescheduled the customer meetings and got back. (Most customers would understand)
Anyway, good luck.
This is ludicrous! Are we criminals? HO has no right to disrupt my business by appearing unannounced.teddybear79 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2017 11:38 amThey do not have right to visit unannounced and take interviews, they can only turn unannounced if you are doing something not allowed in your visa conditions.marcnath wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2017 7:43 amAre you overseas ?business meeting with my overseas clients and didn't go back to london
While HO has the right to even turn up unannounced, they would not be able to use your absence as a reason for rejection.
However, as the office mentioned, it may further delay the application so if I was in your place, I would have rescheduled the customer meetings and got back. (Most customers would understand)
Anyway, good luck.
Anyone showed up on Friday for interview or they postponed it? Did you send any documented proof for your absence?nickonline9 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2017 2:35 amI am on tier 1 entrepreneur visa 200k route. I applied for my extension on 24th Feb 2017. Got complex letter on 24th March.
i received an email from home office on tuesday by 3pm and within two minutes i received a call. The officer asked me if i read the email which i obviously hadn't so i said no. She then said that she wanted to visit my office the next day at 11am but i was out of town and i specified that to her. She then asked me when can i attend the meeting and i said how about friday? She replied that she was busy and she can do it only in the week commencing on 16th october. I said thats ok with me on this she said that do u understand that this will increase the processing time of your visa and i said yes i understand that. I said that i will speak to my clients and try to rearrange the meeting and confirm if i can make it on wednesday. I asked her by what time can i confirm her and she said call me by 7pm on tuesday. I however confirmed that i can't make it on wednesday by 5pm to her and she was ok. In addition to this she said that she will definitely do the meeting in the week commencing on 16th october but will confirm the exact date by friday this week. I said ok.
Today all of sudden i received a call from my partner around 5pm asking me to check my email (he has access to my email so he had checked my email from home office). I saw that i had an email from another officer stating that she has been asked to visit my office tomorrow at 10.30am. Only because the first officer said that the visit will be only in the week commencing on 16th october i changed my plans and arranged a few more business meeting with my overseas clients and didn't go back to london. I had no idea that anyone else will plan a visit on friday neither did the first officer say anything likewise to me. i have emailed (5.20pm) the second officer the conversation i had with first officer and explained her that i can't come back till tomorrow morning because of my commitments. i did not receive any reply from second officer yet.
Anyone has any idea that what will happen now as i m about to miss two interviews in three days time.
There must be something to contact them.nickonline9 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 14, 2018 2:18 pmsorry my mind not working
the address is
UKVA, 66 wilson street, EC2A2BT
nickonline9 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 14, 2018 12:01 pmI have applied for tier 1 entrepreneur visa on 24th feb 2017.
Then i received email on 1st october for interview. I gaveinterview on 9th of october 2017 for 2 hours in my office. In my opinion it was good interview. i sent extra documents which they wanted after 3 to 4 days.
Yesterday i got partial payment back in my bank and today i received one more email saying they wanna conduct interview. i m shocked and surprise to see it as i was not expecting this. I m six month pregnant and can't take any stress now. after investing more than 250k to uk i m going through this.
i really don't know that they sent email by mistake or they really mean it.
If you spend time on the T1E forum you will see plenty of anecdotal examples of if not either clear abuse of the route clear cases where the intention of the T1E route is not remotely achieved. And on the flipside if you are a bigger time entrepreneur (e.g. a tech company with millions of VC investment and 40 Employees) THE ROUTE DOES NOT WORK FOR YOU.
seasky wrote: ↑Sun Mar 25, 2018 12:11 pmIf you spend time on the T1E forum you will see plenty of anecdotal examples of if not either clear abuse of the route clear cases where the intention of the T1E route is not remotely achieved. And on the flipside if you are a bigger time entrepreneur (e.g. a tech company with millions of VC investment and 40 Employees) THE ROUTE DOES NOT WORK FOR YOU.
Everytime you see someone leaving the business or their business partner leaving the business because they got ILR LR. You know (in high likelihood) they were not genuine. (why eave a good running business because you got ILR?)
(this is not aimed at any singular person)
miumiuuk wrote: ↑Sun Mar 25, 2018 4:18 pmseasky wrote: ↑Sun Mar 25, 2018 12:11 pmIf you spend time on the T1E forum you will see plenty of anecdotal examples of if not either clear abuse of the route clear cases where the intention of the T1E route is not remotely achieved. And on the flipside if you are a bigger time entrepreneur (e.g. a tech company with millions of VC investment and 40 Employees) THE ROUTE DOES NOT WORK FOR YOU.
Everytime you see someone leaving the business or their business partner leaving the business because they got ILR LR. You know (in high likelihood) they were not genuine. (why eave a good running business because you got ILR?)
(this is not aimed at any singular person)
Your logic is really strange to me.That is fine a good debate, along the lines of freedom of speech we so love here in the UK is a fine thing, as long as it is not personal of course
Have you ever considered "a White Skin British who set up a company in 20xx and closed it and left in 2018" was not a genuine entrepreneur? (millions of cases/examples out there )If not, on what grounds you can accuse T1e holders who did the same were false entrepreneurs?please do not insert race into this discussion, it has nothing to do with it, you should know better. If your main purpose to use the T1e route is "you have no other good UK visa routes AND you do not take entrepreneurship seriously e.g. you do the absolute minimum in amount of job creation and job pay, AND drop your business once you have ILR then no clearly in my mind you are not an entrepreneur" BTW there are certainly T1e for visa only people who fell in love with what they do and took it seriously, you are an entrepreneur
NO EXCUSES.Home office delay t1e visas over a year and loads of wrong refusals, they should be blamed, not the entrepreneurs.Government/HO is definitely mismanaging the route, the rules should be much stronger on defining entrepreneurship UKVI, a bureaucracy, is fighting in a bureaucratic way with long delays, which is very unfair to the real entrepreneurs, look at this forum from the beginning in the old days decisions were done very fast. My initial application in 2011 2-3 weeks
seasky wrote: ↑Sun Mar 25, 2018 4:57 pmmiumiuuk wrote: ↑Sun Mar 25, 2018 4:18 pmseasky wrote: ↑Sun Mar 25, 2018 12:11 pmIf you spend time on the T1E forum you will see plenty of anecdotal examples of if not either clear abuse of the route clear cases where the intention of the T1E route is not remotely achieved. And on the flipside if you are a bigger time entrepreneur (e.g. a tech company with millions of VC investment and 40 Employees) THE ROUTE DOES NOT WORK FOR YOU.
Everytime you see someone leaving the business or their business partner leaving the business because they got ILR LR. You know (in high likelihood) they were not genuine. (why eave a good running business because you got ILR?)
(this is not aimed at any singular person)
Your logic is really strange to me.That is fine a good debate, along the lines of freedom of speech we so love here in the UK is a fine thing, as long as it is not personal of course
Have you ever considered "a White Skin British who set up a company in 20xx and closed it and left in 2018" was not a genuine entrepreneur? (millions of cases/examples out there )If not, on what grounds you can accuse T1e holders who did the same were false entrepreneurs?please do not insert race into this discussion, it has nothing to do with it, you should know better. If your main purpose to use the T1e route is "you have no other good UK visa routes AND you do not take entrepreneurship seriously e.g. you do the absolute minimum in amount of job creation and job pay, AND drop your business once you have ILR then no clearly in my mind you are not an entrepreneur" BTW there are certainly T1e for visa only people who fell in love with what they do and took it seriously, you are an entrepreneur
NO EXCUSES.Home office delay t1e visas over a year and loads of wrong refusals, they should be blamed, not the entrepreneurs.Government/HO is definitely mismanaging the route, the rules should be much stronger on defining entrepreneurship UKVI, a bureaucracy, is fighting in a bureaucratic way with long delays, which is very unfair to the real entrepreneurs, look at this forum from the beginning in the old days decisions were done very fast. My initial application in 2011 2-3 weeks
You raised the race issue, I have no idea why you would do that. you should stop digging your hole and not mention race anymore.miumiuuk wrote: ↑Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:29 pm
None of your replies is stick to the point and questions. There is NO race issue here if you think we (British entrepreneurs or other nationalities') are the same and equal.
Your initial visa was approved within 2-3 weeks in 2011. which just only proves, it WAS fast.
seasky wrote: ↑Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:44 pmYou raised the race issue, I have no idea why you would do that. you should stop digging your hole and not mention race anymore.miumiuuk wrote: ↑Sun Mar 25, 2018 5:29 pm
None of your replies is stick to the point and questions. There is NO race issue here if you think we (British entrepreneurs or other nationalities') are the same and equal.
Your initial visa was approved within 2-3 weeks in 2011. which just only proves, it WAS fast.
My understanding is that in 2011 the T1Es were in the 100s by far the vast majority wanted to open a business in the UK and that was the right route. Today it has jumped by over an order of magnitude and many are doing it because they have no other visa routes. The HO did set back then some minimal criteria (as bureaucracies do) but did not foresee the abuse that would come
Let me ask your learned opinion. A t1e opens a business, makes jobs for the exact minimum needed for points. Then fires the employees (not needed for points any more) till after extension. Then hires again the minimum for ILR the fires them (basically applies for ILR with a "running" business with no employees). Is she a genuine entrepreneur in your mind?
Are you aware of British citizens who opened businesses and hire employees "just for the sake of it" fire them wait 9-15 months hire again for exactly one year and fire them?
Aha! the known miracle of God/Allah/Jesus/Jehova/Buddha/Elohim that both your employees leave of their "own wills" the day you reached 52X2X30 hours of employment, you did not replace them for a year during 12-15 months of extension (what the business did not need the employees that left?) and suddenly their is need for exactly 52X2X30 hours of employment after extension is granted (and miracle repeats for exactly that! of their own will!)
seasky wrote: ↑Sun Mar 25, 2018 6:09 pmAha! the known miracle of God/Allah/Jesus/Jehova/Buddha/Elohim that both your employees leave of their "own wills" the day you reached 52X2X30 hours of employment, you did not replace them for a year during 12-15 months of extension (what the business did not need the employees that left?) and suddenly their is need for exactly 52X2X30 hours of employment after extension is granted (and miracle repeats for exactly that! of their own will!)