- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
I can't see how you would apply for ILR for your child without an existing visa. However, your child can directly register for citizenship once you get your ILR approved.
As per NHS rules, your child has access to free medical service only for three months after birth.
I really appreciate your input for the above and I do understand your point that the child can be treated free for the first three Months if this is written in the rule. Can you please direct me to the immigration rule where it justify your argument? I am under the impression that any child born in the UK will automatically covered as long as the parents hold valid visa and no intentions to travel abroad. Please correct me and also would like to see other people openion on this.marcnath wrote: ↑Wed Aug 01, 2018 12:38 pmI can't see how you would apply for ILR for your child without an existing visa. However, your child can directly register for citizenship once you get your ILR approved.
As per NHS rules, your child has access to free medical service only for three months after birth.
However, it appears the NHS systems are not very good so haven't heard of this being strictly being implemented.
But, if and when they fix their systems, it is possible that they will charge you for any medical services beyond the three months.
If I were in your place, I would apply for a dependant visa to take care of this risk (as any billed NHS fees will be very high) but it is your individual choice.
I really appreciate your input for the above and I do understand your point that the child can be treated free for the first three Months if this is written in the rule.
No, a child is NOT covered 'automatically' if they do not hold a valid visa. Don't confuse the entitlement to register as British without holding a visa to that of using the free NHS services. They are separate.I am under the impression that any child born in the UK will automatically covered as long as the parents hold valid visa and no intentions to travel abroad. Please correct me and also would like to see other people openion on this.
Thank you CR001 for your advise.CR001 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 01, 2018 1:01 pmI really appreciate your input for the above and I do understand your point that the child can be treated free for the first three Months if this is written in the rule.
See page 11 in the link below. It is not in the immigration rules, but a NHS policy.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... s_2015.pdf
No, a child is NOT covered 'automatically' if they do not hold a valid visa. Don't confuse the entitlement to register as British without holding a visa to that of using the free NHS services. They are separate.I am under the impression that any child born in the UK will automatically covered as long as the parents hold valid visa and no intentions to travel abroad. Please correct me and also would like to see other people openion on this.