- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
A court order is unnecessary, if the parent or carer with whom the child normally lives agrees to direct access (in person) to the child.E -ECPT.2.4.(a) wrote:(ii) direct access (in person) to the child, as agreed with the parent or carer with whom the child normally lives or as ordered by a court in the UK; and
(b) The applicant must provide evidence that they are taking, and intend to continue to take, an active role in the child’s upbringing.
immigration-for-family-members/uk-famil ... l#p1615964vinny wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 1:40 pmA court order is unnecessary, if the parent or carer with whom the child normally lives agrees to direct access (in person) to the child.E -ECPT.2.4.(a) wrote:(ii) direct access (in person) to the child, as agreed with the parent or carer with whom the child normally lives or as ordered by a court in the UK; and
(b) The applicant must provide evidence that they are taking, and intend to continue to take, an active role in the child’s upbringing.
That is correct. Furthermore i did not read from the post, that OP has been convicted of any offence. Therefore i am not sure he can fall under the criminal sanctions in the rule.
One difference in the above ruling is that the OP has made no attempt to regularise his immigration status after being removed from the UK. In fact he continued to make further attempts to re-enter.Obie wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 5:33 pmThat is correct. Furthermore i did not read from the post, that OP has been convicted of any offence. Therefore i am not sure he can fall under the criminal sanctions in the rule.
Even 320(11) is not a giving, having regards to PS (paragraph 320(11) discretion: care needed) India [2010] UKUT 440 (IAC) (28 September 2010)
Chocolate certainly has a lot to answer for...me too! I was referring to the preceding years...obtaining a new passport (presumably to hide bad immigration history), entering several times 'through the back door' to avoid detection..etc.Obie wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 6:32 pmWell it may be the effect of the Easter eggs or the meal, but it seems to me from reading his post, that he is seeking a lawful means of coming to the UK to be a part of his child's life through lawful means, or maybe I am just wrong.
It does not appear from my reading, that he is seeking to find ways of entering UK illegally.
That is quite interesting, i have never actually seen it from that perspective. Your are always a very kind and compassionate person Casa, who has always been helping people on this forum long before i dreamt of joining it, and i have never seen you as a bad cop. I respect your views that action does have consequences.
vinny wrote: ↑Fri Mar 30, 2018 1:40 pmA court order is unnecessary, if the parent or carer with whom the child normally lives agrees to direct access (in person) to the child.E -ECPT.2.4.(a) wrote:(ii) direct access (in person) to the child, as agreed with the parent or carer with whom the child normally lives or as ordered by a court in the UK; and
(b) The applicant must provide evidence that they are taking, and intend to continue to take, an active role in the child’s upbringing.