ESC

Click the "allow" button if you want to receive important news and updates from immigrationboards.com


Immigrationboards.com: Immigration, work visa and work permit discussion board

Welcome to immigrationboards.com!

Login Register Do not show

Not sure why homeoffice have done this

Only for queries regarding Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR). Please use the EU Settlement Scheme forum for queries about settled status under Appendix EU

Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha

Locked
confusedduck
Newly Registered
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue May 28, 2019 8:52 pm
United Kingdom

Not sure why homeoffice have done this

Post by confusedduck » Tue May 28, 2019 9:07 pm

Hi guys,
So I will try to bullet point my story and please share your thoughts.

1) Applies for ILR(M) for my wife in March. Her current FLR(M) is still valid till march 2020

* She had reached 5 years under partner and spousal visa in december, I realise now my mistake of counting the 1 year under she was under partner of Tier-2 General in the total. I settled a year after she came here and subsequently got my British citizenship

2) Home office requests documents pertaining to my son. Please note that I had not attached any documents
regarding our son(who is British by birth because of me) and my application was for ILR(M)

3) Thinking that is additional documents they want, I provided as prompted.

4) We received rejection of her ILR(M) application for the reasons stated above (only 48 months so far). Important to note that by that count she will qualify next March, till when her current visa runs anyway.

5) Homeoffice however have considered her application in an alternative route and happy to grant her leave if we pay nhs surcharge etc. Now the interesting point to note in that letter is that they want us to select FLR(FP) when paying that surcharge. So they are considering her application on an FLR(FP) to get 30 months but would that not put her on a 10 year path?! When she doesnt even need but to wait till next year to apply for ILR? I find that irritating that we couldve easily just clicked and paid surcharge online and gotten further into a muddle?

Why would they try to put her on a different path? Or am I reading too much into this?

The important question is. If we do not pay the surcharge in the next 7 days and the application is rejected as stated in the letter. Does her current leave to remain still stay valid? (the FLR(M) which goes till march 2020)

User avatar
aman90
Diamond Member
Posts: 1685
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2014 8:41 pm
United Kingdom

Re: Not sure why homeoffice have done this

Post by aman90 » Tue May 28, 2019 9:36 pm

As long as you don’t take any action towards this letter...she has extant leave..you may apply for ILR when she’s eligible ie within 28 days of completing 60 months..

User avatar
aman90
Diamond Member
Posts: 1685
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2014 8:41 pm
United Kingdom

Re: Not sure why homeoffice have done this

Post by aman90 » Tue May 28, 2019 9:39 pm

12 months to go but visa expires in March 2020.. extension required..

confusedduck
Newly Registered
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue May 28, 2019 8:52 pm
United Kingdom

Re: Not sure why homeoffice have done this

Post by confusedduck » Tue May 28, 2019 9:40 pm

is there any option to withdraw application at this point? or I just have to take the rejection. It is weird why they did not offer her instead extention on her current route of FLR(M). My documentation is fully on point so there is no rejection there. She has had 3 successful application using similar document sets.

confusedduck
Newly Registered
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue May 28, 2019 8:52 pm
United Kingdom

Re: Not sure why homeoffice have done this

Post by confusedduck » Tue May 28, 2019 9:41 pm

aman90 wrote:
Tue May 28, 2019 9:39 pm
12 months to go but visa expires in March 2020.. extension required..
Sorry 12 months from march. Extension not required. We applied in March. March 2020 makes 60 months

User avatar
aman90
Diamond Member
Posts: 1685
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2014 8:41 pm
United Kingdom

Re: Not sure why homeoffice have done this

Post by aman90 » Tue May 28, 2019 9:46 pm

confusedduck wrote:
Tue May 28, 2019 9:40 pm
is there any option to withdraw application at this point? or I just have to take the rejection. It is weird why they did not offer her instead extention on her current route of FLR(M). My documentation is fully on point so there is no rejection there. She has had 3 successful application using similar document sets.
She had valid leave till March 2020 why would they offer extension.. if she completes 60 months by the time her current visa expires then you can safely apply for ILR..
I think you should be able to withdraw.. but you won’t get any fees back.
Read the guidance on withdrawal and varying..

User avatar
CR001
Moderator
Posts: 89095
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 10:55 pm
Location: London
Mood:
South Africa

Re: Not sure why homeoffice have done this

Post by CR001 » Tue May 28, 2019 9:48 pm

Ignore the letter and request for Ihs. It is a generic letter/template when an applicant doesn't quify for ILR on Set M
Char (CR001 not Casa)
In life you cannot press the Backspace button!!
Please DO NOT send me a PM for immigration advice. I reserve the right to ignore the PM and not respond.

confusedduck
Newly Registered
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue May 28, 2019 8:52 pm
United Kingdom

Re: Not sure why homeoffice have done this

Post by confusedduck » Tue May 28, 2019 11:34 pm

CR001 wrote:
Tue May 28, 2019 9:48 pm
Ignore the letter and request for Ihs. It is a generic letter/template when an applicant doesn't quify for ILR on Set M
Yes thanks, that makes more sense that some hollywood conspiracy. Is there anyway to double confirm that me ignoring the letter and the application getting rejected has no bearing on the validity of her current visa? Is it worth attempting to "withdraw" application from the online form even though withdrawing is not valid anymore as application decision has been made? Or any other suggested course of action?

User avatar
CR001
Moderator
Posts: 89095
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 10:55 pm
Location: London
Mood:
South Africa

Re: Not sure why homeoffice have done this

Post by CR001 » Wed May 29, 2019 6:07 am

No effect on current visa.

You could write back and state you will remain on the current visa till you qualify for ILR

As the application is basically decided, you can't withdraw as far as I understand.
Char (CR001 not Casa)
In life you cannot press the Backspace button!!
Please DO NOT send me a PM for immigration advice. I reserve the right to ignore the PM and not respond.

Locked