General UK immigration & work permits; don't post job search or family related topics!
Please use this section of the board if there is no specific section for your query.
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, Administrator
-
Sushil-ACCA
- Diamond Member
- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 2:47 pm
- Location: Wembley Park
Post
by Sushil-ACCA » Tue May 12, 2009 4:14 pm
I need suggestions in following case
===========================
old hsmp applicant sept 2004
applied wife and kids visa feb 2005 refused on ground of low income
may 05 wife got visa
sept 05 applicant and wife got extn till 9/2008
july 08 husban & wife got extn till sept 2011
============================
April 09 applied for kids and mother visit visa
mother visa approvd
kids rejected
The refusal reason is based on 319H (f)-both of the applicants parent must either be lawfully present in UK, or being granted entry clearance or leave to remain at the same time as the applicant. You have not provided any documentary evidence to suggest the whereabouts of your mother and she has not made an application with you.
Documents submitted
1. Covering letter from husband mentioning wife have visa till 9/2011
2. Bank -fund documents
3 House documents
4 Orignal all HO LETTERs, last HO Letter issued in 7/2008 was addresed to husband and wife for extn theri visa till 9/2011
5. Wife's 6 months bank statements of barclay bank for fund strength
=============================================
is ECO is corect or person should go for appeal and if yes what are chances and grounds
Thanks
-
mohdh
- Junior Member
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 6:38 pm
Post
by mohdh » Tue May 12, 2009 7:58 pm
Get in touch with HSMP Forum.
[quote="Sushil-ACCA"]I need suggestions in following case
===========================
old hsmp applicant sept 2004
applied wife and kids visa feb 2005 refused on ground of low income
may 05 wife got visa
sept 05 applicant and wife got extn till 9/2008
july 08 husban & wife got extn till sept 2011
============================
April 09 applied for kids and mother visit visa
mother visa approvd
kids rejected
The refusal reason is based on 319H (f)-both of the applicants parent must either be lawfully present in UK, or being granted entry clearance or leave to remain at the same time as the applicant. You have not provided any documentary evidence to suggest the whereabouts of your mother and she has not made an application with you.
Documents submitted
1. Covering letter from husband mentioning wife have visa till 9/2011
2. Bank -fund documents
3 House documents
4 Orignal all HO LETTERs, last HO Letter issued in 7/2008 was addresed to husband and wife for extn theri visa till 9/2011
5. Wife's 6 months bank statements of barclay bank for fund strength
=============================================
is ECO is corect or person should go for appeal and if yes what are chances and grounds
Thanks[/quote]
-
Sushil-ACCA
- Diamond Member
- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 2:47 pm
- Location: Wembley Park
Post
by Sushil-ACCA » Wed May 13, 2009 3:54 pm
ANY one other taker to help some one , i am not good in this but still i can get tips from here to help
regards
-
Sushil-ACCA
- Diamond Member
- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 2:47 pm
- Location: Wembley Park
Post
by Sushil-ACCA » Thu May 14, 2009 10:47 am
It is very strange no one is taker
after 100 hit, Nevermind , Modrator or seniors can put some litght
-
bani
- Senior Member
- Posts: 796
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 10:01 am
- Location: UK
-
Contact:
Post
by bani » Thu May 14, 2009 2:58 pm
ECO is wrong. I assume you sent copies of your residence permits. Bank statements should be considered as proof of address. You can add another proof of address such as another account/bill that is in your wife's name. Sorry, I don't know process of appeal, but ECO is clearly mistaken.
-
Sushil-ACCA
- Diamond Member
- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 2:47 pm
- Location: Wembley Park
Post
by Sushil-ACCA » Fri May 15, 2009 10:49 am
Thanks Bani
I Have same view and convey the message
thanks