- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha
Thank you, I will do that and use Address A in London. I was just thinking that then HO sees I declared rental income from Address B in Leeds and starts questionning. OK I guess let me worry about it when that actually happens later after I submit my applictaion. Cheers.Zerubbabel wrote: ↑Sun Jun 07, 2020 3:34 pmHello
You have to be consistent to avoid issues. Address A was declared to the police and I guess is with the HO, so it's better to keep it simple and consistent. I would use address A in London.
So HMRC has two addresses of mine, London Address A is the "correspondance address", and Leeds Address B is the "permanent home address". HMRC sends letter to my London Address A. However, all my "proof of address"" documents (bank statements, utility bills, council tax etc. are all under my Leeds Address).Zerubbabel wrote: ↑Sun Jun 07, 2020 4:01 pmYou may have many addresses (rental properties, holiday home... etc) but only one legal address where you reside. This is usually the address on your HRMC letters and Home Office documents.
If you are a leaseholder then maybe your lease won't allow you to keep a lodger. And if you have given ast to lodger then he will be your tenant and you can't live there until eviction. However, if all this arrangement is verbal (none-documented) and tenants/lodger aren't familiar with their rights then no need to worry.
The op has already mentioned in the first post that they bought their property outside of London.seagul wrote: ↑Sun Jun 07, 2020 8:12 pmIf you are a leaseholder then maybe your lease won't allow you to keep a lodger. And if you have given ast to lodger then he will be your tenant and you can't live there until eviction. However, if all this arrangement is verbal (none-documented) and tenants/lodger aren't familiar with their rights then no need to worry.
CR001 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 07, 2020 8:14 pmThe op has already mentioned in the first post that they bought their property outside of London.seagul wrote: ↑Sun Jun 07, 2020 8:12 pmIf you are a leaseholder then maybe your lease won't allow you to keep a lodger. And if you have given ast to lodger then he will be your tenant and you can't live there until eviction. However, if all this arrangement is verbal (none-documented) and tenants/lodger aren't familiar with their rights then no need to worry.
I already read that. I am referring to the likely complications over his rental income by renting the room at op's property in Leeds in case if falls under above mentioned scenarios.
Hi thanks for your reply. Why can't I live there until eviction? I rent a room out and not the whole property out. Also are those of HO's interests?seagul wrote: ↑Sun Jun 07, 2020 8:12 pmIf you are a leaseholder then maybe your lease won't allow you to keep a lodger. And if you have given ast to lodger then he will be your tenant and you can't live there until eviction. However, if all this arrangement is verbal (none-documented) and tenants/lodger aren't familiar with their rights then no need to worry.
Seems like you have a lodger but if by mistake you have given him/her AST which many mistakenly commit then one day some complications might arise including the one relating to HMO for which different councils have different criterions because of forming more than one household.
Whilst not sure whether demonstrating the rental income is relevant to your visa category but any income derived by breaching the relevant condition such as subletting the tenancy/lease (even partly) then it might not be accepted.
You are confusing the situation now with irrelevant information. None of this is relevant to the visa processes. The op has clearly stated they are on tier 2 general and that he owns the property where one room is being rented out, which is allowed under the rent a room scheme.seagul wrote: ↑Sun Jun 07, 2020 9:43 pmSeems like you have a lodger but if by mistake you have given him/her AST which many mistakenly commit then one day some complications might arise including the one relating to HMO for which different councils have different criterions because of forming more than one household.Whilst not sure whether demonstrating the rental income is relevant to your visa category but any income derived by breaching the relevant condition such as subletting the tenancy/lease (even partly) then it might not be accepted.
It's not AST because I do live in the property (I am just away a lot).seagul wrote: ↑Sun Jun 07, 2020 9:43 pmSeems like you have a lodger but if by mistake you have given him/her AST which many mistakenly commit then one day some complications might arise including the one relating to HMO for which different councils have different criterions because of forming more than one household.Whilst not sure whether demonstrating the rental income is relevant to your visa category but any income derived by breaching the relevant condition such as subletting the tenancy/lease (even partly) then it might not be accepted.
Thank you! and I guess I should still put down my London address A on the applictaion form?CR001 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 07, 2020 9:52 pmYou are confusing the situation now with irrelevant information. None of this is relevant to the visa processes. The op has clearly stated they are on tier 2 general and that he owns the property where one room is being rented out, which is allowed under the rent a room scheme.seagul wrote: ↑Sun Jun 07, 2020 9:43 pmSeems like you have a lodger but if by mistake you have given him/her AST which many mistakenly commit then one day some complications might arise including the one relating to HMO for which different councils have different criterions because of forming more than one household.Whilst not sure whether demonstrating the rental income is relevant to your visa category but any income derived by breaching the relevant condition such as subletting the tenancy/lease (even partly) then it might not be accepted.
I was trying to narrow it down within the remit of immigration purposes only if the above scenarios are there. Adding a general information based on probabilities aren't always irrelevant rather might affect sometime.
Not all lease allowed that scheme. Better I dont expand it further otherwise again being rated as irrelevant.
Hey hey thanks for merging and answering my questions as always!CR001 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 12, 2020 4:48 pm1. If that is within 28 days before the 10th anniversary of the date you entered , yes.
2. No.
3. No.
4. Not a mandatory question. There is no right or wrong answer either. It is based in your personal circumstances if you want to answer it. No evidence is required.
5. They have their own way of checking your absences.
6. No.
7. Fine.
8. Probably yes. You can still submit them though.
9. Set LR has NO employment or salary requirement.