- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha
Sorry vinny, I did not see your question "What was your particular problem?"
19.5.—(1) A person required by article 3 to pay a charge must pay the amount required when the person applies for entry clearance or leave to remain, as applicable.
In substance therefore, the May 2016 application would have succeeded had she submitted the payment for the IHS immediately before, rather than a few hours after she submitted the visa application. Mr Woodhouse provided a copy of the Immigration (Health Charge) Order 2015 which at paragraph 5 (1) provides that a person required to pay a charge "must pay the amount required when the person applies for entry clearance or leave to remain, as applicable". That Statutory Instrument does not state in terms that it must be paid prior to the application and in this case the appellant in fact made the payment on the same day as she made the application. It would have been a matter that may have been resolved by Judicial Review at the time. Unfortunately, the appellant was at all times making her applications without the benefit of legal advice.
I must praise your knowledge on the subject and also thank you so much for providing these references and the case documents, really appreciate it.vinny wrote: ↑Sat Oct 31, 2020 3:09 pmWhen a charge must be paid19.5.—(1) A person required by article 3 to pay a charge must pay the amount required when the person applies for entry clearance or leave to remain, as applicable.In substance therefore, the May 2016 application would have succeeded had she submitted the payment for the IHS immediately before, rather than a few hours after she submitted the visa application. Mr Woodhouse provided a copy of the Immigration (Health Charge) Order 2015 which at paragraph 5 (1) provides that a person required to pay a charge "must pay the amount required when the person applies for entry clearance or leave to remain, as applicable". That Statutory Instrument does not state in terms that it must be paid prior to the application and in this case the appellant in fact made the payment on the same day as she made the application. It would have been a matter that may have been resolved by Judicial Review at the time. Unfortunately, the appellant was at all times making her applications without the benefit of legal advice.