- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, Administrator
Exactly. I personally know such people myself. Statistics about how many people from these nationalities attended previous ceremonies are enough for a proof.usmanch313 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 12:21 amVery rare cases they give approval in a year or less than.
I know very personally people from Pakistan who applied in January 2017 Base on marriage with Irish citizens and still wating .
Second person applied in April 2017 no response yet .
Thirld friend wife applied in March 18 nothing yet.
4th person applied in July 18 nothing yet.
5th person friend wife base on Refugees applied in June 17 nothing yet.
They are all Pakistani.
These all cases is proof because I know these people very personally, I'm totally agreed with this oppinion that DOJ and INIS are treating unfairly with these nationalities.
Brilliant idea! Thanks.Statusquo73 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 12:54 amHi guys,
What I suggest is lets contact some of the journalist, reporters who covered Citizenship issue recently..
If at least 5-6 people email those people They will put on their newspaper.
Imagine a topic like " Citizenship applicants cannot leave Ireland for a year" made a huge noise. Now if we push and tell them our story ( even anonymously) It will be a great topic to cover for them.\
I bbelive we have 2 option, MEDIA or Judical Review.
Meanhile I write myself to journalists and ask them to put this topic on their newspaper.
However we we all together do it It will make a difference. I need your help on this guys....
Lets acts together.
FYIAlixlboy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 8:11 amhttp://www.inis.gov.ie/en/INIS/Pages/pr ... -waterford
Check out the above. The relevant countries got almost zero approvals in the previous ceremony. Not even in the list. How unfair and ridiculous. Even the ceremony before this one had no people attending from these countries that I have mentioned. These stats and facts can be used while writing to the journalists and/or going legal against the current Minister of Injustice and Inequality.
The list on that page is only the top ten countries at that ceremony. There are people from other countries not listed there.Alixlboy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 8:11 amhttp://www.inis.gov.ie/en/INIS/Pages/pr ... -waterford
Check out the above. The relevant countries got almost zero approvals in the previous ceremony. Not even in the list. How unfair and ridiculous. Even the ceremony before this one had no people attending from these countries that I have mentioned. These stats and facts can be used while writing to the journalists and/or going legal against the current Minister of Injustice and Inequality.
Common sense. If Afghanistan, Pakistan etc were in those 200, they would be in the top 10.White_Pearl wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 9:00 amFYIAlixlboy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 8:11 amhttp://www.inis.gov.ie/en/INIS/Pages/pr ... -waterford
Check out the above. The relevant countries got almost zero approvals in the previous ceremony. Not even in the list. How unfair and ridiculous. Even the ceremony before this one had no people attending from these countries that I have mentioned. These stats and facts can be used while writing to the journalists and/or going legal against the current Minister of Injustice and Inequality.
Only a total of 458 are mentioned in the top 10 list, the other about 200 can be pakistani/african nationals.
But there must be other material available aswell online which you can use when you will write to journalists and there are also real life examples from your surroundings available, if those people are willing to put their hands up together with you.
I am not here to put your moral down, but there is a real life friend of mine, spouse of irish cit./ pakistani who got his approval in 8months (in 2017).
So really, dont know what they really look at when making a decision that for one it goes that quickly and for the other it can take more than 3 yrs. good luck with it![]()
The last country had 10 people attending. If the relevant countries were there, why would they not include them in the top 10? God knows where the remaining hidden 200 people exactly came from, but any other nationality had at least less than 9 guys.markem wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 9:01 amThe list on that page is only the top ten countries at that ceremony. There are people from other countries not listed there.Alixlboy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 8:11 amhttp://www.inis.gov.ie/en/INIS/Pages/pr ... -waterford
Check out the above. The relevant countries got almost zero approvals in the previous ceremony. Not even in the list. How unfair and ridiculous. Even the ceremony before this one had no people attending from these countries that I have mentioned. These stats and facts can be used while writing to the journalists and/or going legal against the current Minister of Injustice and Inequality.
Besides, this is really not a good way of making the argument. You need to know how many people from those countries actually applied to know if this is good or bad.
No that’s not how you use statistics. The onus is on you to demonstrate how many people of these nations live in Ireland and how many of them have applied for naturalisation during this period. You can get these figures from CSO and by raising parliamentary questions via your TD.Alixlboy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 10:17 amThe last country had 10 people attending. If the relevant countries were there, why would they not include them in the top 10? God knows where the remaining hidden 200 people exactly came from, but any other nationality had at least less than 9 guys.markem wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 9:01 amThe list on that page is only the top ten countries at that ceremony. There are people from other countries not listed there.Alixlboy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 8:11 amhttp://www.inis.gov.ie/en/INIS/Pages/pr ... -waterford
Check out the above. The relevant countries got almost zero approvals in the previous ceremony. Not even in the list. How unfair and ridiculous. Even the ceremony before this one had no people attending from these countries that I have mentioned. These stats and facts can be used while writing to the journalists and/or going legal against the current Minister of Injustice and Inequality.
Besides, this is really not a good way of making the argument. You need to know how many people from those countries actually applied to know if this is good or bad.
Easy and simple analysis of the given statistics shows this fact.
That isn't a great example to use. It came across as hyperbolic.
You can do whatever you like. But be warned that people (including the media) might not see the problem you believe exists. You're trying to make a generalisation about whole countries being discriminated against, based on a handful of examples. That's like me saying "all cars are black" based on the five I can see out my window right now.Alixlboy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 10:34 amWhere have you all come up with this idea of statistics being a mandatory requirement for approaching the media or protesting against unfair treatment? These are just guidelines and please take them as a guideline only.
My personal circumstances are enough of a proof for me to give me the right to protest.
I'm going to look at the arguments based on facts.
True.masterboy123 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 12:19 pmPlease remember :
The granting of Irish citizenship through naturalisation is a privilege, and not a right.
Alixlboy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 12:43 pmTrue.masterboy123 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 12:19 pmPlease remember :
The granting of Irish citizenship through naturalisation is a privilege, and not a right.
But protesting against unfair treatment is our right.
In previous such cases, judges have asked them to explain and give the reason for not giving approval within 6 months, so no clause protects them as such.masterboy123 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 1:32 pmNo harm in trying but they have clause which will protect the department and I doubt it will bring any change.
Alixlboy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 12:43 pmTrue.masterboy123 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 12:19 pmPlease remember :
The granting of Irish citizenship through naturalisation is a privilege, and not a right.
But protesting against unfair treatment is our right.
I think that s not fair towards the man. He was given a chance but no chance as a matter of fact.Omad24 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 1:47 pmThe man from the article was given a ticket over ten years ago with the cop claiming his disc is expired he peeled it out and said it was not. They went to court together and he was told to pay anyways. He applied for citizenship and was denied 10 years ago for a record. He then was given a wait time then told he may apply again after such time has passed. When he applied he was denied again
It’s ridiculous someone can denied for a ticket. Then on top of that denied again after waiting 10 yearsAlixlboy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 5:12 pmI think that s not fair towards the man. He was given a chance but no chance as a matter of fact.Omad24 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 1:47 pmThe man from the article was given a ticket over ten years ago with the cop claiming his disc is expired he peeled it out and said it was not. They went to court together and he was told to pay anyways. He applied for citizenship and was denied 10 years ago for a record. He then was given a wait time then told he may apply again after such time has passed. When he applied he was denied again
ExactlyOmad24 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 6:53 pmIt’s ridiculous someone can denied for a ticket. Then on top of that denied again after waiting 10 yearsAlixlboy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 5:12 pmI think that s not fair towards the man. He was given a chance but no chance as a matter of fact.Omad24 wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2019 1:47 pmThe man from the article was given a ticket over ten years ago with the cop claiming his disc is expired he peeled it out and said it was not. They went to court together and he was told to pay anyways. He applied for citizenship and was denied 10 years ago for a record. He then was given a wait time then told he may apply again after such time has passed. When he applied he was denied again
Absolutely ridiculous