- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
I have given the baby birth certificate, passports, with evidence of we both living together like GP letter,photographs, supporting letters from my friends, and few hospital letters showing exceptionalcircumstances of not applying the leave to remain in timeCR001 wrote:Please don't post the same question in so many other topics. I have split your query to its own topic.
No one can tell you if you will or will not be successful as we don't have the full circumstances of your case or what supporting documents were submitted to HO etc.
With only occasional visits from the father and no evidence of shared custody, you may find it difficult to prove compassionate and compelling circumstances to remain in the UK if your application is purely based on being the mother of a British child.Zgohar200 wrote:Her father visits her occasionally but I m sole responsible for her upbringing n she lives with me
Note in the ZH(Tanzania) judgement that the children were in education here and had already established a life in the UK and had regular contact with the father.kamsi wrote:I completely disagree that the HO will take the view that as the father of the child is not involved in her upbringing that the child and father will not be disadvantaged if the mother was asked to leave the UK. As someone who has been following UK immigration for over 6 years, the law favours single mother with a British citizen child. A woman with a young British child is more likely to be granted than a man who applies for Leave to remain relying on his British citizen child.
The OP should concentrate in proving that the father of the father of the child is unwilling to or shows little interest in the upbringing of the child. Once she's able to prove this I see no reason why she wouldn't be granted leave because of the parental relationship she has with her British child.
If the father is not willing to provide care for the child and the mother is asked to leave the UK, obviously the British citizen child will be made to leave the U.K. with the mother. Asking a British citizen child to leave the U.K. is clearly unlawful. There are body of case law to support this argument. Please see ZH(Tanzania) judgment.
In my opinion the OP's case is overwhelmingly strong because of her British citizen child. The age of the child is immaterial:Casa wrote:Note in the ZH(Tanzania) judgement that the children were in education here and had already established a life in the UK and had regular contact with the father.kamsi wrote:I completely disagree that the HO will take the view that as the father of the child is not involved in her upbringing that the child and father will not be disadvantaged if the mother was asked to leave the UK. As someone who has been following UK immigration for over 6 years, the law favours single mother with a British citizen child. A woman with a young British child is more likely to be granted than a man who applies for Leave to remain relying on his British citizen child.
The OP should concentrate in proving that the father of the father of the child is unwilling to or shows little interest in the upbringing of the child. Once she's able to prove this I see no reason why she wouldn't be granted leave because of the parental relationship she has with her British child.
If the father is not willing to provide care for the child and the mother is asked to leave the UK, obviously the British citizen child will be made to leave the U.K. with the mother. Asking a British citizen child to leave the U.K. is clearly unlawful. There are body of case law to support this argument. Please see ZH(Tanzania) judgment.
[They cannot] be expected to move to a country which they do not know [when this results in their being] separated from a parent whom they also know well."
This is why I suggested that as the father of the baby has little involvement in the child's life it could weaken the case. Also a 3 month old baby is too young to have established a life in the UK as in ZH(Tananzia).
For those who are interested in the Supreme Court judgement, the link from Migration Watch is below:
https://www.migrationwatchuk.org/briefing-paper/220
Thank you. It's always helpful for other members to be aware of the outcome of similar cases. I'm pleased you had other grounds.Elliewifetoalbanian wrote:I disagree the age of the child is immaterial after personally recently going through the flr fp process.
I'm British born my child is British.
My husband was refused flr fp. We were told my child 10 days old could adapt and live in Albania. She wasn't westernised. She did not know English so could learn Albanian language easily. She did not know and understand a life in the UK etc. According to home office.
The judge at first tier agreed it was not unreasonable to expect the child to leave the UK. If they were older developed relationships was in nursery etc she said it would be different.
I won my appeal anyway on other grounds.