- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
It's not right and it's probably not strictly legal (discrimiination based on nationality), but the UK government is using these kind of tactics to force non-citizens to obtain BRPs. And as these scenarios have played out on these forums, it doesn't seem there is much practical recourse. Once you get everything sorted out, find another job making sure your former employer understands that you are leaving because of the way they've treated you and would presumably treat any other foreigner legally present and legally working in the country.Tamaraz wrote: ↑Tue Nov 28, 2017 10:15 am
What do you all think of me being suspended without pay - an immigration attorney I spoke with said there was no need for this but my employer isn't budging -
I really can't see how anybody who has obtained permanent residence would reasonably be expected to keep up with changes like this. For many people, that is the end of their immigration journey. There shouldn't be any need to keep one's finger on the pulse of immigration law changes once that stage is complete (unless you are an enthusiast like some of the volunteers on this forum).Tamaraz wrote: ↑Tue Nov 28, 2017 10:15 amTHANKS - Its all been incredibly stressful - can someone also tell me - how were we meant to know about the changes in these rules?
Yeah that's the basic idea. Still situations like this can get awkward real fast. I'm not sure how carefully you want to play this. Then I think that they've just suspended you, indefinitely, without pay. The difference between that and just plain being let go is not much. And if you're like 99% plus percent of the people who post on this forum, you've got bills to pay (a small group of people who post here from time-to-time have obviously gamed the UK immigration system so that they don't have to worry about such things). I'd seriously consider just how valuable you are to this company from their perspective and your own. It seems to me, if you were really worth it to them, they'd be on your side. Just sayin'.
Atleast your notifications are working! (Mine work for PM's, but never for thread replies *sigh*) It's probably just a browser thing. Your message will appear in the thread to which it was posted. If it doesn't, try clearing your browser cache and refreshing.
Better yet, the lawyer should demand it, and the feedback should be directed at the lawyer.zimba88 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 5:54 pmYou should demand the HR to perform a check via Employer Checking Service to prove you have indeed the right to work in the UK until you get your documents in order as getting NTL/BRP can take a while. That should be enough for them to let you work legally.
https://www.gov.uk/check-job-applicant-right-to-work
Not that I'm aware, no.
The mods can move it if they think it is on-topic. You can PM them or make a suggestion in the Commnets and discussion board.
I disagree with your comments above and do not think that intervention of a lawyer is necessary. If the employee was simply dismissed then there could have been a legal case. The employer has not discriminated against the employee as far as I can see and has followed the law.Better yet, the lawyer should demand it, and the feedback should be directed at the lawyer.
That certainly is a broad shield for employers. In order to avoid getting sued, or even breaking the law outright, they just indefinitely suspend someone without pay. One hell of a loophole (that I suspect doesn't really exist as it would simply be to treacherous and obvious)zimba88 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 29, 2017 9:39 pmI disagree with your comments above and do not think that intervention of a lawyer is necessary. If the employee was simply dismissed then there could have been a legal case.Better yet, the lawyer should demand it, and the feedback should be directed at the lawyer.
Hence my point above about the toxic environment that has been created by recent rule changes. Do you really believe it is reasonable to expect that somebody who has finished their immigration journey at permanent residence, years or perhaps decades ago, should be keeping up with rule changes like this? Sorry, but I don't agree. The OP is right to feel how they feel about this situation. They shouldn't need a lawyer at all. Their employer should be pushing back with the obvious point, "How can somebody who has been legally working in the country (and for us), and has provided sufficient evidence that they can do so indefinitely, suddenly not be legally working in the country?" I can sense the OP's frustration on this matter. It's palpable and hard not to empathize.
A hefty civil penaly for employing somebody who is legally allowed to reside and work without restriction in the UK? I don't think so....
And in fairness to your point, I admit that I don't read every thread on this forum. It's entirely possible that I've missed the thread where that actually worked. But I've read several threads where that kind of friendly common sense approach didn't work.
You don't get anything. You enrol your biometrics at the post office (fingerprints and photo) and they send it to HO to continue processing your application. Once processed and approved, you will be sent a biometric residence permit card.Tamaraz wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2017 6:06 pmThanks for this - helpful but I don't think it addresses my issue - I wasn't dismissed I was put on unpaid suspended leave...but its interesting nonetheless -
Does anyone know what I get from the "machine" when I do my biometrics? Does the machine actually issue something?
THANKS -
Tamaraz
Only once your applicatuon is approved.